ES vs EIX

For growth investors, Eversource Energy (ES) is the stronger pick with 13.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 8% for Edison International (EIX). Edison International (EIX) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Edison International (EIX) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Edison International (EIX) is the cheapest at 6.

0x versus Eversource Energy at 15. 0x. On forward P/E, Edison International is actually cheaper at 11. 2x.

Over the past 5 years, Edison International (EIX) delivered a total return of +42.

7%, compared to -2. 5% for Eversource Energy (ES). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ES returned +61. 8% versus EIX's +33. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eversource Energy (ES) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

27β versus Edison International's 0. 42β — meaning EIX is approximately 57% more volatile than ES relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eversource Energy (ES) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 185% versus 2% for Edison International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eversource Energy (ES) is pulling ahead at 13.

8% versus 9. 8% for Edison International (EIX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Edison International grew EPS 248. 9% year-over-year, compared to 100. 9% for Eversource Energy. Over a 3-year CAGR, EIX leads at 3. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Edison International (EIX) is the more profitable company, earning 23.

6% net margin versus 12. 5% for Eversource Energy — meaning it keeps 23. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EIX leads at 36. 7% versus 22. 1% for ES. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EIX leads at 57. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Edison International (EIX) trades at 11.

2x forward P/E versus 14. 5x for Eversource Energy — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EIX: 8. 5% to $74. 67.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Edison International (EIX) offers the highest yield at 4. 8%, versus 4. 3% for Eversource Energy (ES).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Eversource Energy (ES) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

27), 4. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ES: +61. 8%, EIX: +33. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.