ES vs PPL

For growth investors, Eversource Energy (ES) is the stronger pick with 13.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 9% for PPL Corporation (PPL). Eversource Energy (ES) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (14. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PPL Corporation (PPL) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Eversource Energy (ES) is the cheapest at 15.

0x versus PPL Corporation at 23. 1x. On forward P/E, Eversource Energy is actually cheaper at 14. 5x.

Over the past 5 years, PPL Corporation (PPL) delivered a total return of +46.

9%, compared to -2. 5% for Eversource Energy (ES). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ES returned +61. 8% versus PPL's +31. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PPL Corporation (PPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

05β versus Eversource Energy's 0. 27β — meaning ES is approximately 438% more volatile than PPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PPL Corporation (PPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 85% versus 185% for Eversource Energy — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eversource Energy (ES) is pulling ahead at 13.

8% versus 6. 9% for PPL Corporation (PPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eversource Energy grew EPS 100. 9% year-over-year, compared to 33. 3% for PPL Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PPL leads at 4. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

PPL Corporation (PPL) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

1% net margin versus 12. 5% for Eversource Energy — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PPL leads at 23. 6% versus 22. 1% for ES. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PPL leads at 39. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Eversource Energy (ES) trades at 14.

5x forward P/E versus 18. 9x for PPL Corporation — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PPL: 12. 7% to $41. 57.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Eversource Energy (ES) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 2. 9% for PPL Corporation (PPL).

For long-horizon retirement investors, PPL Corporation (PPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

05), 2. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PPL: +31. 7%, ES: +61. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ES is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PPL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.