Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FBLA vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FBLA vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $278M | $203M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $86M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 75.6% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | -7.4% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $74M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $99M | $119M |
FBLA vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FB Bancorp, Inc. Co… (FBLA) | 100 | 120.5 | +20.5% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 149.2 | +49.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBLA vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FBLA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.45
- Rev growth 8.8%, EPS growth -6.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 22.5%, current ratio 0.26x
CZWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 156.6% 10Y total return vs FBLA's 18.3%
- Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs FBLA's 0.8% (lower = leaner)
- 1.8% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.8% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs FBLA's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs CZWI's 0.46, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.9% vs FBLA's +25.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs FBLA's 0.8% |
FBLA vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FBLA vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CZWI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CZWI and FBLA operate at a comparable scale, with $90M and $86M in trailing revenue. CZWI is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FBLA's -7.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $86M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.6% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.2% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.7% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FBLA leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $278M | $203M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $253M | $136M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -37.92x | 14.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.84x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.24x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.73x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CZWI leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CZWI delivers a 7.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-1 for FBLA. FBLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZWI's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CZWI scores 6/9 vs FBLA's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.8% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.2% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.3% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.6% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$25M | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $99M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $74M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.11x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,345 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,830 for FBLA. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +42.9% total return vs FBLA's +25.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.4% vs FBLA's 5.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.7% | +21.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.4% | +42.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.3% | +159.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.3% | +73.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.3% | +156.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.8% | +37.4% |
Risk & Volatility
FBLA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FBLA is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CZWI's 0.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FBLA currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 93.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.45x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.23 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.71 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.6% | +93.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.0 | 66.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 144K | 41K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
CZWI is the only dividend payer here at 1.76% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.3% | +3.1% |
CZWI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBLA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
FBLA vs CZWI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBLA or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FB Bancorp, Inc.
Common Stock (FBLA) is the stronger pick with 8. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FBLA or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +73. 4%, compared to +18. 3% for FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock (FBLA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +156. 6% versus FBLA's +19. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FBLA or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FB Bancorp, Inc.
Common Stock (FBLA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 46β — meaning CZWI is approximately 2% more volatile than FBLA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock (FBLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 28% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FBLA or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FB Bancorp, Inc.
Common Stock (FBLA) is pulling ahead at 8. 8% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 9. 0% year-over-year, compared to -671. 0% for FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FBLA or CZWI?
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 0% net margin versus -7. 2% for FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CZWI leads at 7. 0% versus -7. 4% for FBLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBLA leads at 75. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FBLA or CZWI?
In this comparison, CZWI (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. FBLA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is FBLA or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +156. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +156. 6%, FBLA: +19. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FBLA and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FBLA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. CZWI pays a dividend while FBLA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.