Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FBYD vs PRKS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
FBYD vs PRKS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $159M | $2.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $1.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $168M |
| Gross Margin | 78.1% | 92.3% |
| Operating Margin | -164.9% | 22.0% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $41M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $825K | $100M |
FBYD vs PRKS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Falcon's Beyond Glo… (FBYD) | 100 | 94.5 | -5.5% |
| United Parks & Reso… (PRKS) | 100 | 86.0 | -14.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBYD vs PRKS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FBYD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.65
- Rev growth -63.0%, EPS growth 125.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, current ratio 0.09x
PRKS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 103.5% 10Y total return vs FBYD's -13.9%
- -3.6% revenue growth vs FBYD's -63.0%
- 6.4% ROA vs FBYD's 1.6%, ROIC 25.5% vs -58.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.6% revenue growth vs FBYD's -63.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 10.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.2% margin vs PRKS's 10.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs PRKS's 1.54 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.8% vs PRKS's -18.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs FBYD's 1.6%, ROIC 25.5% vs -58.5% |
FBYD vs PRKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FBYD vs PRKS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRKS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 171.9x FBYD's $10M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.2% (FBYD) to 10.1% (PRKS). On growth, FBYD holds the edge at +95.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $540M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | $168M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$24M | $263M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.1% | +92.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -164.9% | +22.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +10.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +15.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.9% | -2.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -128.3% | -44.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FBYD and PRKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.9x trailing earnings, FBYD trades at a 27% valuation discount to PRKS's 12.1x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $159M | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $199M | $1.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.85x | 12.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 3.56x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 23.55x | 1.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRKS leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRKS scores 5/9 vs FBYD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -58.5% | +25.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -101.8% | +15.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $40M | -$100M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $825,000 | $100M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $41M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.36x | 2.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FBYD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBYD five years ago would be worth $8,607 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,903 for PRKS. Over the past 12 months, FBYD leads with a +73.8% total return vs PRKS's -18.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FBYD at -4.9% vs PRKS's -13.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.4% | +2.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +73.8% | -18.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.9% | -34.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.9% | -31.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.9% | +103.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.9% | -13.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FBYD and PRKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FBYD is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRKS's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRKS currently trades 65.1% from its 52-week high vs FBYD's 43.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 1.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.02 | $56.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.71 | $28.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.0% | +65.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.1 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 101K | 944K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $47.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
PRKS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBYD leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
FBYD vs PRKS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBYD or PRKS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) is the stronger pick with -3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -63. 0% for Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Class A Common Stock (FBYD). Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Class A Common Stock (FBYD) offers the better valuation at 8. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBYD or PRKS?
On trailing P/E, Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc.
Class A Common Stock (FBYD) is the cheapest at 8. 9x versus United Parks & Resorts Inc. at 12. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBYD or PRKS?
Over the past 5 years, Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc.
Class A Common Stock (FBYD) delivered a total return of -13. 9%, compared to -31. 0% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRKS returned +103. 5% versus FBYD's -13. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBYD or PRKS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc.
Class A Common Stock (FBYD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus United Parks & Resorts Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning PRKS is approximately 137% more volatile than FBYD relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — FBYD or PRKS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) is pulling ahead at -3. 6% versus -63. 0% for Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Class A Common Stock (FBYD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Class A Common Stock grew EPS 125. 2% year-over-year, compared to -19. 3% for United Parks & Resorts Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FBYD leads at 3. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FBYD or PRKS?
Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc.
Class A Common Stock (FBYD) is the more profitable company, earning 327. 0% net margin versus 10. 1% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. — meaning it keeps 327. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRKS leads at 22. 0% versus -235. 2% for FBYD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBYD leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — FBYD or PRKS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is FBYD or PRKS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc.
Class A Common Stock (FBYD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65)). United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FBYD: -13. 9%, PRKS: +103. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FBYD and PRKS?
These companies operate in different sectors (FBYD (Industrials) and PRKS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.