Copper
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FCX vs TECK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial Materials
FCX vs TECK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Copper | Industrial Materials |
| Market Cap | $82.93B | $27.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $26.42B | $12.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.73B | $1.85B |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 30.3% |
| Operating Margin | 27.8% | 23.9% |
| Forward P/E | 21.3x | 12.4x |
| Total Debt | $11.50B | $10.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.35B | $5.01B |
FCX vs TECK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX) | 100 | 636.2 | +536.2% |
| Teck Resources Limi… (TECK) | 100 | 609.1 | +509.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FCX vs TECK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FCX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.79, yield 1.0%
- 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs TECK's 0.6%
- 4.7% ROA vs TECK's 4.1%, ROIC 12.8% vs 4.4%
TECK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 262.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.7%
- 499.9% 10Y total return vs FCX's 440.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 40.0%, current ratio 2.54x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.6% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.4x vs 21.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.9% margin vs FCX's 10.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.73 vs FCX's 1.79 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs TECK's 0.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.7% vs FCX's +56.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs TECK's 4.1%, ROIC 12.8% vs 4.4% |
FCX vs TECK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FCX vs TECK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FCX and TECK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCX is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.4B annually — 2.1x TECK's $12.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.9% (TECK) to 10.3% (FCX). On growth, TECK holds the edge at +72.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26.4B | $12.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.6B | $4.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.7B | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6.2B | $482M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +30.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +23.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.3% | +14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +3.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.2% | +72.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +154.2% | +128.8% |
Valuation Metrics
TECK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.8x trailing earnings, TECK trades at a 27% valuation discount to FCX's 38.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FCX's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TECK's 11.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $82.9B | $27.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $91.1B | $31.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.96x | 27.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.33x | 12.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.27x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.67x | 11.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.22x | 3.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.71x | 1.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 74.31x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FCX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FCX delivers a 8.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $7 for TECK. FCX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TECK's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TECK scores 6/9 vs FCX's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.9% | +7.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.7% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.8% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.4% | +4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.1B | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.4B | $5.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11.5B | $10.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.68x | 4.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TECK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TECK five years ago would be worth $25,170 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,576 for FCX. Over the past 12 months, TECK leads with a +66.7% total return vs FCX's +56.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FCX at 17.7% vs TECK's 10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.7% | +20.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +56.1% | +66.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.1% | +35.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.8% | +151.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +440.5% | +499.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.7% | +10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
TECK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TECK is the less volatile stock with a 1.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FCX's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TECK currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs FCX's 81.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.79x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.97 | $63.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.15 | $30.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.3% | +91.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.7 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15.5M | 3.8M |
Analyst Outlook
FCX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FCX as "Buy" and TECK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.1% upside for FCX (target: $67) vs 11.6% for TECK (target: $65). For income investors, FCX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.04% vs TECK's 0.63%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $67.00 | $64.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 41 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | $0.50 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +2.7% |
TECK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). FCX leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
FCX vs TECK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FCX or TECK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger pick with 18.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Teck Resources Limited (TECK) offers the better valuation at 27. 8x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FCX or TECK?
On trailing P/E, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the cheapest at 27.
8x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 38. 0x. On forward P/E, Teck Resources Limited is actually cheaper at 12. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FCX or TECK?
Over the past 5 years, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) delivered a total return of +151.
7%, compared to +45. 8% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TECK returned +499. 9% versus FCX's +440. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FCX or TECK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
73β versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning FCX is approximately 3% more volatile than TECK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 40% for Teck Resources Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FCX or TECK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is pulling ahead at 18.
6% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teck Resources Limited grew EPS 262. 8% year-over-year, compared to 16. 9% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FCX leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FCX or TECK?
Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
0% net margin versus 8. 6% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCX leads at 24. 4% versus 16. 5% for TECK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCX leads at 27. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FCX or TECK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) trades at 12.
4x forward P/E versus 21. 3x for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — 9. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FCX: 16. 1% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FCX or TECK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) offers the highest yield at 1. 0%, versus 0. 6% for Teck Resources Limited (TECK).
09Is FCX or TECK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
6% yield, +499. 9% 10Y return). Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TECK: +499. 9%, FCX: +440. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FCX and TECK?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TECK is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.