FHN vs HBAN

For growth investors, Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) is the stronger pick with 4.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for First Horizon Corporation (FHN). Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) offers the better valuation at 11. 8x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) is the cheapest at 11.

8x versus First Horizon Corporation at 13. 2x. On forward P/E, Huntington Bancshares Incorporated is actually cheaper at 11. 2x.

Over the past 5 years, First Horizon Corporation (FHN) delivered a total return of +48.

6%, compared to +25. 4% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HBAN returned +121. 9% versus FHN's +121. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

09β versus First Horizon Corporation's 1. 10β — meaning FHN is approximately 1% more volatile than HBAN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Horizon Corporation (FHN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 76% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) is pulling ahead at 4.

4% versus 1. 0% for First Horizon Corporation (FHN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Horizon Corporation grew EPS 38. 2% year-over-year, compared to 13. 9% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

First Horizon Corporation (FHN) is the more profitable company, earning 19.

7% net margin versus 17. 7% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FHN leads at 25. 7% versus 21. 5% for HBAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FHN leads at 67. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) trades at 11.

2x forward P/E versus 11. 6x for First Horizon Corporation — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HBAN: 24. 2% to $20. 38.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 2. 6% for First Horizon Corporation (FHN).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

09), 3. 7% yield, +121. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HBAN: +121. 9%, FHN: +121. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.