FLUT vs CZR

For growth investors, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) is the stronger pick with 16.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). Analysts rate Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) delivered a total return of -51.

1%, compared to -72. 8% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZR returned +310. 0% versus FLUT's -24. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

23β versus Caesars Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning CZR is approximately 3% more volatile than FLUT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 138% versus 7% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) is pulling ahead at 16.

6% versus 2. 1% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Caesars Entertainment, Inc. grew EPS -87. 6% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLUT leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) is the more profitable company, earning -1.

9% net margin versus -4. 4% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps -1. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CZR leads at 18. 1% versus 6. 3% for FLUT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLUT leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLUT: 129.

9% to $227. 86.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Caesars Entertainment, Inc.

(CZR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 27), +310. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZR: +310. 0%, FLUT: -24. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FLUT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.