Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FLYY vs AAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
FLYY vs AAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | — | $8.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.67B | $55.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.33B | $202M |
| Gross Margin | 3.8% | 21.8% |
| Operating Margin | -23.2% | 3.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 76.1x |
| Total Debt | $6.81B | $35.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $902M | $1.69B |
Quick Verdict: FLYY vs AAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLYY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.94
- Lower volatility, beta 1.94, current ratio 1.19x
- Beta 1.94, current ratio 1.19x
AAL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 0.8%, EPS growth -86.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- -56.3% 10Y total return vs FLYY's -98.1%
- 0.8% revenue growth vs FLYY's -8.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.8% revenue growth vs FLYY's -8.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.4% margin vs FLYY's -28.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.94 vs AAL's 1.96 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.1% vs FLYY's -94.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.3% ROA vs FLYY's -15.5%, ROIC 3.5% vs -12.7% |
FLYY vs AAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FLYY vs AAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAL leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $56.0B annually — 12.0x FLYY's $4.7B. AAL is the more profitable business, keeping 0.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FLYY's -28.6%. On growth, AAL holds the edge at +10.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $56.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$764M | $3.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.3B | $202M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$950M | $1.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +21.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -23.2% | +3.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -28.6% | +0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -20.3% | +3.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.4% | +10.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +19.4% |
Valuation Metrics
FLYY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $8.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $42.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.03x | 76.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAL scores 6/9 vs FLYY's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.8% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.5% | +0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.7% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.2% | +3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.9B | $34.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $902M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.8B | $36.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.12x | 2.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AAL leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAL five years ago would be worth $6,021 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $190 for FLYY. Over the past 12 months, AAL leads with a +24.1% total return vs FLYY's -94.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAL at -3.4% vs FLYY's -73.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -94.0% | +24.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | -9.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | -39.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | -56.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -73.3% | -3.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLYY and AAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLYY is the less volatile stock with a 1.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAL's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAL currently trades 78.4% from its 52-week high vs FLYY's 5.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.94x | 1.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.49 | $16.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.16 | $10.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +5.1% | +78.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.0 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 134K | 67.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | 0.0% |
AAL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLYY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
FLYY vs AAL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLYY or AAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Airlines Group Inc.
(AAL) is the stronger pick with 0. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for Spirit Aviation Holdings, Inc. (FLYY). American Airlines Group Inc. (AAL) offers the better valuation at 76. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Airlines Group Inc. (AAL) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FLYY or AAL?
Over the past 5 years, American Airlines Group Inc.
(AAL) delivered a total return of -39. 8%, compared to -98. 1% for Spirit Aviation Holdings, Inc. (FLYY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAL returned -56. 3% versus FLYY's -98. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FLYY or AAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Spirit Aviation Holdings, Inc.
(FLYY) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 94β versus American Airlines Group Inc. 's 1. 96β — meaning AAL is approximately 1% more volatile than FLYY relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — FLYY or AAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Airlines Group Inc.
(AAL) is pulling ahead at 0. 8% versus -8. 4% for Spirit Aviation Holdings, Inc. (FLYY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Airlines Group Inc. grew EPS -86. 3% year-over-year, compared to -174. 6% for Spirit Aviation Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLYY leads at 15. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FLYY or AAL?
American Airlines Group Inc.
(AAL) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 2% net margin versus -25. 0% for Spirit Aviation Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAL leads at 2. 7% versus -22. 5% for FLYY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AAL leads at 19. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FLYY or AAL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is FLYY or AAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Airlines Group Inc.
(AAL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Spirit Aviation Holdings, Inc. (FLYY) carries a higher beta of 1. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAL: -56. 3%, FLYY: -98. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FLYY and AAL?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.