REIT - Specialty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FPI vs AFCG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
FPI vs AFCG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $466M | $65M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $54M | $2M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30M | $-21M |
| Gross Margin | 78.7% | 66.0% |
| Operating Margin | 45.6% | -393.9% |
| Forward P/E | 50.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $161M | $76M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $39M |
FPI vs AFCG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmland Partners I… (FPI) | 100 | 95.3 | -4.7% |
| Advanced Flower Cap… (AFCG) | 100 | 19.3 | -80.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FPI vs AFCG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FPI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 11.6%
- Rev growth -10.4%, EPS growth -41.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.2%
- 33.2% 10Y total return vs AFCG's -44.4%
AFCG is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -10.4% FFO/revenue growth vs AFCG's -39.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 56.0% margin vs AFCG's -9.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs AFCG's 1.86, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs AFCG's 31.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.2% vs AFCG's -41.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs AFCG's -7.0%, ROIC 2.4% vs -4.1% |
FPI vs AFCG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FPI vs AFCG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FPI and AFCG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FPI is the larger business by revenue, generating $54M annually — 25.5x AFCG's $2M. FPI is the more profitable business, keeping 56.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AFCG's -9.8%. On growth, AFCG holds the edge at +185.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $54M | $2M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $28M | -$15M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | -$21M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.7% | +66.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +45.6% | -3.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +56.0% | -9.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.9% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.5% | +185.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -64.2% | +174.7% |
Valuation Metrics
AFCG leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $466M | $65M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $618M | $103M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.23x | -2.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 50.07x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.70x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.93x | 2.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 0.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.74x | 5.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FPI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FPI delivers a 5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-11 for AFCG. FPI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AFCG's 0.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FPI scores 6/9 vs AFCG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.7% | -11.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | -7.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.4% | -4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | -5.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $152M | $38M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $39M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $161M | $76M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.34x | -2.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FPI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FPI five years ago would be worth $9,699 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,497 for AFCG. Over the past 12 months, FPI leads with a +9.2% total return vs AFCG's -41.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FPI at 6.2% vs AFCG's -8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.0% | -1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.2% | -41.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.9% | -24.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.0% | -45.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.2% | -44.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.2% | -8.9% |
Risk & Volatility
FPI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FPI is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AFCG's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FPI currently trades 80.7% from its 52-week high vs AFCG's 47.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.56x | 1.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.23 | $5.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.37 | $2.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.7% | +47.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.2 | 53.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 408K | 218K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FPI and AFCG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, AFCG offers the higher dividend yield at 31.34% vs FPI's 11.64%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.6% | +31.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.24 | $0.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.2% | 0.0% |
FPI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). AFCG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FPI vs AFCG: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FPI or AFCG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Farmland Partners Inc.
(FPI) is the stronger pick with -10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 6% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG). Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) offers the better valuation at 17. 2x trailing P/E (50. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) a "Hold" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FPI or AFCG?
Over the past 5 years, Farmland Partners Inc.
(FPI) delivered a total return of -3. 0%, compared to -45. 0% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FPI returned +33. 2% versus AFCG's -44. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FPI or AFCG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Farmland Partners Inc.
(FPI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Advanced Flower Capital Inc. 's 1. 86β — meaning AFCG is approximately 232% more volatile than FPI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 43% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FPI or AFCG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Farmland Partners Inc.
(FPI) is pulling ahead at -10. 4% versus -39. 6% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Farmland Partners Inc. grew EPS -41. 5% year-over-year, compared to -218. 8% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FPI leads at -5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FPI or AFCG?
Farmland Partners Inc.
(FPI) is the more profitable company, earning 60. 5% net margin versus -66. 0% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. — meaning it keeps 60. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FPI leads at 44. 2% versus -43. 6% for AFCG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AFCG leads at 90. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FPI or AFCG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG) offers the highest yield at 31. 3%, versus 11. 6% for Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI).
07Is FPI or AFCG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Farmland Partners Inc.
(FPI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), 11. 6% yield). Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FPI: +33. 2%, AFCG: -44. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FPI and AFCG?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FPI is a small-cap deep-value stock; AFCG is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.