Financial - Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FSHPR vs ACIC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
FSHPR vs ACIC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Conglomerates | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $157K | $505M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $335M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $910K | $107M |
| Gross Margin | — | 63.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 42.6% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | 7.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $152M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $77K | $199M |
FSHPR vs ACIC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flag Ship Acquisiti… (FSHPR) | 100 | 57.1 | -42.9% |
| American Coastal In… (ACIC) | 100 | 100.2 | +0.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FSHPR vs ACIC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FSHPR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.07, yield 100.0%
- EPS growth 9.5%
- Lower P/E (0.3x vs 7.1x)
ACIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -24.0% 10Y total return vs FSHPR's -33.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 48.0%, current ratio 1.22x
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.22x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 7.1x) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs FSHPR's 1.07 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -3.3% vs FSHPR's -39.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs FSHPR's 2.6% |
FSHPR vs ACIC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACIC and FSHPR operate at a comparable scale, with $335M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $335M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $154M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $107M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $71M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +63.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +42.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +31.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +21.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FSHPR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.3x trailing earnings, FSHPR trades at a 93% valuation discount to ACIC's 4.9x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $156,844 | $505M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $80,097 | $458M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.32x | 4.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 2.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIC leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACIC scores 6/9 vs FSHPR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +35.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +41.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +26.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$76,747 | -$46M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $76,747 | $199M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $152M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 14.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACIC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACIC five years ago would be worth $19,850 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,658 for FSHPR. Over the past 12 months, ACIC leads with a -3.3% total return vs FSHPR's -39.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACIC at 35.8% vs FSHPR's -12.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.1% | -1.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -39.1% | -3.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.4% | +150.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.4% | +98.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.4% | -24.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.7% | +35.8% |
Risk & Volatility
ACIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FSHPR's 1.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACIC currently trades 79.9% from its 52-week high vs FSHPR's 36.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.07x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.22 | $13.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $9.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.5% | +79.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.7 | 54.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 188K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
FSHPR is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.49 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ACIC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FSHPR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
FSHPR vs ACIC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FSHPR or ACIC a better buy right now?
Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation (FSHPR) offers the better valuation at 0.
3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) a "Hold" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FSHPR or ACIC?
On trailing P/E, Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation (FSHPR) is the cheapest at 0.
3x versus American Coastal Insurance Corporation at 4. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FSHPR or ACIC?
Over the past 5 years, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) delivered a total return of +98.
5%, compared to -33. 4% for Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation (FSHPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACIC returned -24. 0% versus FSHPR's -33. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FSHPR or ACIC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
39β versus Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation's 1. 07β — meaning FSHPR is approximately 175% more volatile than ACIC relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — FSHPR or ACIC?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation grew EPS 947.
5% year-over-year, compared to 40. 5% for American Coastal Insurance Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FSHPR or ACIC?
American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
8% net margin versus 0. 0% for Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation — meaning it keeps 31. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACIC leads at 42. 6% versus 0. 0% for FSHPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACIC leads at 86. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — FSHPR or ACIC?
In this comparison, FSHPR (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. ACIC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FSHPR or ACIC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
39)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACIC: -24. 0%, FSHPR: -33. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FSHPR and ACIC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
FSHPR pays a dividend while ACIC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.