Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) vs Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CRM | 9.6% revenue growth vs FTFT's -90.1% |
| Quality / Margins | CRM | 18.0% net margin vs FTFT's -15.3% |
| Stability / Safety | FTFT | Beta 0.78 vs CRM's 1.04, lower leverage |
| Dividends | CRM | 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; FTFT pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FTFT | -26.2% vs CRM's -34.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CRM | 6.6% ROA vs FTFT's -50.9%, ROIC 10.9% vs -141.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Future FinTech Group is a diversified technology company operating blockchain-based e-commerce platforms and financial technology services. It generates revenue through shared shopping mall membership fees, fruit product sales, goods sales, and supply chain financing—with its blockchain e-commerce platform Chain Cloud Mall being a core offering. The company's competitive advantage lies in its early integration of blockchain technology into e-commerce and financial services, though its diverse operations across multiple segments create a complex business model.
Salesforce is a cloud-based customer relationship management (CRM) software company that helps businesses manage sales, service, marketing, and commerce operations. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees for its SaaS platform—with sales cloud (~30%), service cloud (~25%), and platform/other (~45%) being its main segments. Its competitive moat lies in its massive ecosystem of integrated applications, enterprise data architecture, and high switching costs for customers deeply embedded in its platform.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
CRM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FTFT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
CRM and FTFT operate at a comparable scale, with $41.5B and -$10M in trailing revenue. CRM is the more profitable business, keeping 18.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FTFT's -15.3%. On growth, CRM holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FTFTFuture FinTech Gr… | CRMSalesforce, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$10M | $41.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$59M | $11.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$28M | $7.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $14.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.9% | +77.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.7% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -15.3% | +18.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | +34.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -74.4% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +86.4% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FTFTFuture FinTech Gr… | CRMSalesforce, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30M | $187.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $26M | $186.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.09x | 24.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.04x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 13.91x | 4.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.25x | 3.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CRM delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-64 for FTFT. FTFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRM's 0.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRM scores 8/9 vs FTFT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | FTFTFuture FinTech Gr… | CRMSalesforce, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -63.8% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -50.9% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -141.0% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -121.1% | +11.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$590M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $7.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $6.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -816.53x | 44.14x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in CRM five years ago would be worth $9,104 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $52 for FTFT. Over the past 12 months, FTFT leads with a -26.2% total return vs CRM's -34.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRM at 6.6% vs FTFT's -56.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FTFTFuture FinTech Gr… | CRMSalesforce, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +98.7% | -23.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.2% | -34.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.6% | +21.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -9.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | +192.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -56.2% | +6.6% |
Risk & Volatility
FTFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRM's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRM currently trades 64.3% from its 52-week high vs FTFT's 29.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FTFTFuture FinTech Gr… | CRMSalesforce, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 1.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.00 | $303.07 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.56 | $174.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.8% | +64.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.7 | 47.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 41K | 8.6M |
Analyst Outlook
CRM is the only dividend payer here at 0.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | FTFTFuture FinTech Gr… | CRMSalesforce, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $299.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 97 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.66 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.7% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Future FinTech Grou… (FTFT) | 100 | 5.02 | -95.0% |
| Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) | 100 | 119.26 | +19.3% |
Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) returned -9% over 5 years vs Future FinTech Grou… (FTFT)'s -99%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Future FinTech Grou… (FTFT) | $10M | $2M | -79.4% |
| Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) | $8.4B | $41.5B | +394.8% |
Salesforce, Inc.'s revenue grew from $8.4B (2017) to $41.5B (2026) — a 19.4% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Future FinTech Grou… (FTFT) | -9.8% | -15.3% | -55.8% |
| Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) | 3.8% | 18.0% | +366.6% |
Salesforce, Inc.'s net margin went from 4% (2017) to 18% (2026).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 7 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) | 393.2 | 25 | -93.6% |
Salesforce, Inc. has traded in a 25x–393x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~25x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Future FinTech Grou… (FTFT) | -183.45 | -15.7 | +91.4% |
| Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) | 0.26 | 7.8 | +2900.0% |
Salesforce, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.26 (2017) to $7.80 (2026) — a 46% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Future FinTech Group Inc. generated $-11M FCF in 2024 (+46% vs 2021). Salesforce, Inc. generated $14B FCF in 2026 (+252% vs 2021).
FTFT vs CRM: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTFT or CRM a better buy right now?
Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) offers the better valuation at 25.0x trailing P/E (16.5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) a "Buy" — based on 97 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FTFT or CRM?
Over the past 5 years, Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) delivered a total return of -9.0%, compared to -99.5% for Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT). A $10,000 investment in CRM five years ago would be worth approximately $9K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRM returned +192.3% versus FTFT's -99.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FTFT or CRM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.78β versus Salesforce, Inc.'s 1.04β — meaning CRM is approximately 32% more volatile than FTFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 11% for Salesforce, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — FTFT or CRM?
Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) is the more profitable company, earning 18.0% net margin versus -1527.2% for Future FinTech Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 18.0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRM leads at 21.5% versus -1571.4% for FTFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRM leads at 77.7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — FTFT or CRM?
In this comparison, CRM (0.9% yield) pays a dividend. FTFT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is FTFT or CRM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.04), 0.9% yield, +192.3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRM: +192.3%, FTFT: -99.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between FTFT and CRM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. CRM pays a dividend while FTFT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.