GEOS
Geospace Technologies Corporation
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$110M
5Y Perf.+7.9%
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
GEOS vs MIND vs OIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MIND
MIND Technology, Inc.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$60M
5Y Perf.-57.1%
OIS
Oil States International, Inc.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$535M
5Y Perf.+109.7%
GEOS vs MIND vs OIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | GEOS | MIND | OIS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $110M | $60M | $535M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $101M | $46M | $509M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-29M | $3M | $-106M |
| Gross Margin | 14.3% | 44.5% | -9.3% |
| Operating Margin | -30.2% | 12.0% | -1.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.3x | 15.2x |
| Total Debt | $974K | $1M | $88M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $26M | $5M | $70M |
GEOS vs MIND vs OIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
GEOS
MIND
OIS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geospace Technologi… (GEOS) | 100 | 107.9 | +7.9% |
| MIND Technology, In… (MIND) | 100 | 42.9 | -57.1% |
| Oil States Internat… (OIS) | 100 | 209.7 | +109.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GEOS vs MIND vs OIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MIND leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Oil States International, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
GEOS
Geospace Technologies Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder
GEOS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -45.8% 10Y total return vs OIS's -71.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.91, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 3.62x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
MIND
MIND Technology, Inc.
The Growth Play
MIND carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 28.4%, EPS growth 268.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.6%
- 28.4% revenue growth vs GEOS's -18.3%
- Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure
OIS
Oil States International, Inc.
The Income Pick
OIS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.34
- Beta 1.34, current ratio 1.86x
- Beta 1.34 vs MIND's 2.13
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MIND | 28.4% revenue growth vs GEOS's -18.3% |
| Value | MIND | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | MIND | 6.6% margin vs GEOS's -28.9% |
| Stability / Safety | OIS | Beta 1.34 vs MIND's 2.13 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | OIS | +109.2% vs MIND's -1.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MIND | 6.4% ROA vs GEOS's -19.9%, ROIC 24.4% vs -7.4% |
GEOS vs MIND vs OIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2022
FY 2025
GEOS vs MIND vs OIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMINDLAGGINGGEOS
GEOSGeospace Technologies…
0leads
OISOil States Internatio…
2leads
MINDMIND Technology, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs OISvs GEOSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MIND3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MIND5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
OIS3/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
OIS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MIND leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $509M annually — 11.0x MIND's $46M. MIND is the more profitable business, keeping 6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GEOS's -28.9%. On growth, GEOS holds the edge at +9.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | GEOSGeospace Technolo… | MINDMIND Technology, … | OISOil States Intern… |
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $101M | $46M | $509M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$26M | $6M | $37M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$29M | $3M | -$106M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$32M | $5M | $68M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.3% | +44.5% | -9.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -30.2% | +12.0% | -1.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -28.9% | +6.6% | -20.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -31.3% | +11.1% | +13.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.5% | -20.0% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.7% | -99.7% | -60.5% |
MIND leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GEOS and OIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MIND's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than OIS's 12.9x.
| Metric | GEOSGeospace Technolo… | MINDMIND Technology, … | OISOil States Intern… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $110M | $60M | $535M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $84M | $56M | $553M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.18x | 10.33x | -4.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 15.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.18x | 12.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.99x | 1.27x | 0.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.87x | 1.93x | 0.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 279.17x | 7.24x |
Evenly matched — GEOS and OIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MIND leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MIND delivers a 7.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-24 for GEOS. GEOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OIS's 0.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MIND scores 7/9 vs GEOS's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | GEOSGeospace Technolo… | MINDMIND Technology, … | OISOil States Intern… |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -24.2% | +7.6% | -16.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.9% | +6.4% | -11.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.4% | +24.4% | -0.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.6% | +26.6% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.05x | 0.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$25M | -$4M | $18M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26M | $5M | $70M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $974,000 | $1M | $88M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1746.60x | — | -1.40x |
MIND leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OIS five years ago would be worth $13,288 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,899 for MIND. Over the past 12 months, OIS leads with a +109.2% total return vs MIND's -1.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MIND at 15.4% vs GEOS's 4.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GEOSGeospace Technolo… | MINDMIND Technology, … | OISOil States Intern… |
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -52.0% | -26.6% | +25.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.6% | -1.6% | +109.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.3% | +53.7% | +28.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.4% | -71.0% | +32.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.8% | -80.1% | -71.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.9% | +15.4% | +8.7% |
OIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OIS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OIS is the less volatile stock with a 1.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MIND's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OIS currently trades 61.3% from its 52-week high vs GEOS's 28.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | GEOSGeospace Technolo… | MINDMIND Technology, … | OISOil States Intern… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 2.13x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.89 | $14.50 | $14.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.51 | $5.51 | $4.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.4% | +45.6% | +61.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.0 | 44.4 | 29.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 203K | 181K | 931K |
OIS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GEOS as "Hold", OIS as "Hold".
| Metric | GEOSGeospace Technolo… | MINDMIND Technology, … | OISOil States Intern… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | — | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | 0.0% | +3.1% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
MIND leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OIS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
Best OverallMIND Technology, Inc. (MIND)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
GEOS vs MIND vs OIS: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GEOS or MIND or OIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MIND Technology, Inc.
(MIND) is the stronger pick with 28. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 3% for Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS). MIND Technology, Inc. (MIND) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) a "Hold" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GEOS or MIND or OIS?
Over the past 5 years, Oil States International, Inc.
(OIS) delivered a total return of +32. 9%, compared to -71. 0% for MIND Technology, Inc. (MIND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GEOS returned -45. 8% versus MIND's -80. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GEOS or MIND or OIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Oil States International, Inc.
(OIS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 34β versus MIND Technology, Inc. 's 2. 13β — meaning MIND is approximately 59% more volatile than OIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 15% for Oil States International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GEOS or MIND or OIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MIND Technology, Inc.
(MIND) is pulling ahead at 28. 4% versus -18. 3% for Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MIND Technology, Inc. grew EPS 268. 4% year-over-year, compared to -933. 3% for Oil States International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MIND leads at 26. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GEOS or MIND or OIS?
MIND Technology, Inc.
(MIND) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -16. 3% for Oil States International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MIND leads at 14. 5% versus -10. 2% for GEOS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MIND leads at 44. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GEOS or MIND or OIS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is GEOS or MIND or OIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Oil States International, Inc.
(OIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. MIND Technology, Inc. (MIND) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OIS: -71. 4%, MIND: -80. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GEOS and MIND and OIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (GEOS (Energy) and MIND (Technology) and OIS (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GEOS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MIND is a small-cap high-growth stock; OIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(GEOS: 9.5% · MIND: -20.0%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.