Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GLBE vs FOUR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GLBE
Global-e Online Ltd.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$5.52B
5Y Perf.-0.7%
FOUR
Shift4 Payments, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.81B
5Y Perf.-49.8%

GLBE vs FOUR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GLBE logoGLBE
FOUR logoFOUR
IndustrySpecialty RetailSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$5.52B$3.81B
Revenue (TTM)$962M$3.33B
Net Income (TTM)$68M$86M
Gross Margin45.3%35.2%
Operating Margin7.4%11.3%
Forward P/E29.2x8.4x
Total Debt$42M$4.62B
Cash & Equiv.$246M$964M

GLBE vs FOURLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GLBE
FOUR
StockMay 21May 26Return
Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE)10099.3-0.7%
Shift4 Payments, In… (FOUR)10050.2-49.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GLBE vs FOUR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GLBE leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Shift4 Payments, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
GLBE
Global-e Online Ltd.
The Growth Play

GLBE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 27.8%, EPS growth 186.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.63, Low D/E 4.5%, current ratio 1.93x
  • 27.8% revenue growth vs FOUR's 25.5%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
FOUR
Shift4 Payments, Inc.
The Income Pick

FOUR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.51, yield 0.7%
  • 39.7% 10Y total return vs GLBE's 28.0%
  • Beta 1.51, yield 0.7%, current ratio 1.66x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGLBE logoGLBE27.8% revenue growth vs FOUR's 25.5%
ValueFOUR logoFOURLower P/E (8.4x vs 29.2x)
Quality / MarginsGLBE logoGLBE7.1% margin vs FOUR's 2.6%
Stability / SafetyFOUR logoFOURBeta 1.51 vs GLBE's 1.63
DividendsFOUR logoFOUR0.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)GLBE logoGLBE-12.5% vs FOUR's -43.7%
Efficiency (ROA)GLBE logoGLBE4.7% ROA vs FOUR's 1.0%, ROIC 7.7% vs 6.3%

GLBE vs FOUR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GLBEGlobal-e Online Ltd.
FY 2024
Fulfillment Services
53.5%$402M
Service Fees
46.5%$350M
FOURShift4 Payments, Inc.
FY 2025
Payments Based Revenue
88.4%$3.5B
Subscription And Other Revenues
11.6%$454M

GLBE vs FOUR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGLBELAGGINGFOUR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GLBE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

FOUR is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.3B annually — 3.5x GLBE's $962M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.1% (GLBE) to 2.6% (FOUR). On growth, GLBE holds the edge at +28.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGLBE logoGLBEGlobal-e Online L…FOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$962M$3.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$130M$629M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$68M$86M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$295M$687M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+45.3%+35.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.4%+11.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+7.1%+2.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+30.6%+20.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+28.0%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-105.0%
GLBE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FOUR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 43.4x trailing earnings, FOUR trades at a 48% valuation discount to GLBE's 83.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FOUR's 9.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GLBE's 57.4x.

MetricGLBE logoGLBEGlobal-e Online L…FOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …
Market CapShares × price$5.5B$3.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$5.3B$7.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS83.67x43.39x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.29.20x8.41x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.64x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple57.36x9.53x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.74x0.91x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.16x2.13x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.66x7.63x
FOUR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

GLBE leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

GLBE delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $4 for FOUR. GLBE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOUR's 2.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOUR scores 7/9 vs GLBE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGLBE logoGLBEGlobal-e Online L…FOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.3%+4.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.7%+1.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.7%+6.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.7%+6.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x2.36x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$204M$3.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$246M$964M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$42M$4.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense17.83x3.40x
GLBE leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GLBE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GLBE five years ago would be worth $12,796 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,364 for FOUR. Over the past 12 months, GLBE leads with a -12.5% total return vs FOUR's -43.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GLBE at 1.3% vs FOUR's -8.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGLBE logoGLBEGlobal-e Online L…FOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-13.8%-25.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-12.5%-43.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+4.0%-24.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+28.0%-46.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+28.0%+39.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+1.3%-8.7%
GLBE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GLBE and FOUR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FOUR is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GLBE's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GLBE currently trades 75.5% from its 52-week high vs FOUR's 43.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGLBE logoGLBEGlobal-e Online L…FOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.63x1.51x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$43.21$108.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$27.80$39.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+75.5%+43.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.243.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M2.2M
Evenly matched — GLBE and FOUR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates GLBE as "Buy" and FOUR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 56.6% upside for FOUR (target: $73) vs 33.0% for GLBE (target: $43). FOUR is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricGLBE logoGLBEGlobal-e Online L…FOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$43.40$73.36
# AnalystsCovering analysts1429
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.34
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.3%+12.8%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

GLBE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FOUR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallGlobal-e Online Ltd. (GLBE)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GLBE vs FOUR: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GLBE or FOUR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Global-e Online Ltd.

(GLBE) is the stronger pick with 27. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 25. 5% for Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR). Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) offers the better valuation at 43. 4x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GLBE or FOUR?

On trailing P/E, Shift4 Payments, Inc.

(FOUR) is the cheapest at 43. 4x versus Global-e Online Ltd. at 83. 7x. On forward P/E, Shift4 Payments, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GLBE or FOUR?

Over the past 5 years, Global-e Online Ltd.

(GLBE) delivered a total return of +28. 0%, compared to -46. 4% for Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOUR returned +39. 7% versus GLBE's +28. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GLBE or FOUR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shift4 Payments, Inc.

(FOUR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus Global-e Online Ltd. 's 1. 63β — meaning GLBE is approximately 8% more volatile than FOUR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 2% for Shift4 Payments, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GLBE or FOUR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Global-e Online Ltd.

(GLBE) is pulling ahead at 27. 8% versus 25. 5% for Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Global-e Online Ltd. grew EPS 186. 7% year-over-year, compared to -64. 4% for Shift4 Payments, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLBE leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GLBE or FOUR?

Global-e Online Ltd.

(GLBE) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 1% net margin versus 2. 8% for Shift4 Payments, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOUR leads at 8. 4% versus 7. 4% for GLBE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GLBE leads at 45. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GLBE or FOUR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Shift4 Payments, Inc.

(FOUR) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 29. 2x for Global-e Online Ltd. — 20. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FOUR: 56. 6% to $73. 36.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GLBE or FOUR?

In this comparison, FOUR (0.

7% yield) pays a dividend. GLBE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is GLBE or FOUR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Shift4 Payments, Inc.

(FOUR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 7% yield). Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOUR: +39. 7%, GLBE: +28. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GLBE and FOUR?

These companies operate in different sectors (GLBE (Consumer Cyclical) and FOUR (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

FOUR pays a dividend while GLBE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

GLBE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FOUR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 21%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GLBE and FOUR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GLBE: 28.0% · FOUR: -100.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(GLBE: 7.1% · FOUR: 2.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(GLBE: 83.7x · FOUR: 43.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.