Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GLDD vs GVA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
GLDD vs GVA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $1.14B | $6.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $888M | $4.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $73M | $185M |
| Gross Margin | 22.9% | 15.9% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 6.0% |
| Forward P/E | 15.4x | 26.0x |
| Total Debt | $458M | $1.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $529M |
GLDD vs GVA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Great Lakes Dredge … (GLDD) | 100 | 183.4 | +83.4% |
| Granite Constructio… (GVA) | 100 | 681.1 | +581.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLDD vs GVA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLDD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.92
- Rev growth 16.5%, EPS growth 28.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.0%
- 276.9% 10Y total return vs GVA's 238.3%
GVA is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends and momentum.
- 0.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- +74.7% vs GLDD's +72.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.5% revenue growth vs GVA's 10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.4x vs 26.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs GVA's 4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs GVA's 0.98, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +74.7% vs GLDD's +72.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.8% ROA vs GVA's 4.9%, ROIC 9.7% vs 10.8% |
GLDD vs GVA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GLDD vs GVA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLDD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GVA is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.6B annually — 5.2x GLDD's $888M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.3% (GLDD) to 4.0% (GVA). On growth, GVA holds the edge at +30.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $888M | $4.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $169M | $453M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $73M | $185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $99M | $359M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.9% | +15.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +6.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +7.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.5% | +30.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -34.5% | -24.7% |
Valuation Metrics
GLDD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.7x trailing earnings, GLDD trades at a 60% valuation discount to GVA's 38.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GLDD's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GVA's 17.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $6.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $7.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.74x | 38.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.40x | 26.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 10.15x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.34x | 17.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.28x | 1.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.23x | 6.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.41x | 18.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GLDD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GVA delivers a 16.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $15 for GLDD. GLDD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.89x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GVA's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLDD scores 8/9 vs GVA's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.8% | +16.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.8% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.7% | +10.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.4% | +11.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.89x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $445M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $529M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $458M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.32x | 5.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GVA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GVA five years ago would be worth $37,042 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,972 for GLDD. Over the past 12 months, GVA leads with a +74.7% total return vs GLDD's +72.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GVA at 59.1% vs GLDD's 42.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.2% | +19.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +72.1% | +74.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +190.6% | +302.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.7% | +270.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +276.9% | +238.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +42.7% | +59.1% |
Risk & Volatility
GLDD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLDD is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GVA's 0.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.98x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.02 | $145.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.85 | $80.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +97.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.5 | 72.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 543K |
Analyst Outlook
GLDD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GLDD as "Buy" and GVA as "Buy". GVA is the only dividend payer here at 0.30% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $143.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +0.8% |
GLDD leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GVA leads in 1 (Total Returns).
GLDD vs GVA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLDD or GVA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) is the stronger pick with 16.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA). Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (15. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GLDD or GVA?
On trailing P/E, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) is the cheapest at 15.
7x versus Granite Construction Incorporated at 38. 9x. On forward P/E, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GLDD or GVA?
Over the past 5 years, Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) delivered a total return of +270.
4%, compared to +19. 7% for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLDD returned +276. 9% versus GVA's +238. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GLDD or GVA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
92β versus Granite Construction Incorporated's 0. 98β — meaning GVA is approximately 7% more volatile than GLDD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 89% versus 133% for Granite Construction Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GLDD or GVA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) is pulling ahead at 16.
5% versus 10. 4% for Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Granite Construction Incorporated grew EPS 38. 5% year-over-year, compared to 28. 6% for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLDD leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GLDD or GVA?
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
3% net margin versus 4. 4% for Granite Construction Incorporated — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLDD leads at 14. 1% versus 5. 9% for GVA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GLDD leads at 22. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GLDD or GVA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) trades at 15.
4x forward P/E versus 26. 0x for Granite Construction Incorporated — 10. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — GLDD or GVA?
In this comparison, GVA (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. GLDD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GLDD or GVA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
92), +276. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GLDD: +276. 9%, GVA: +238. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GLDD and GVA?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GLDD is a small-cap high-growth stock; GVA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.