Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
GLE vs AIXI vs CLPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
GLE vs AIXI vs CLPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Application | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $9M | $8M | $25M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $115M | $299M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $649K | $-53M | $-4M |
| Gross Margin | 13.3% | 64.3% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | 1.4% | -44.2% | -1.4% |
| Forward P/E | 30.7x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $46M | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $847K | $28M |
GLE vs AIXI vs CLPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Engine Group… (GLE) | 100 | 12.0 | -88.0% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 13.1 | -86.9% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 64.7 | -35.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLE vs AIXI vs CLPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLE is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 1.4% margin vs AIXI's -45.9%
- 0.9% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 37.4% vs -34.4%
AIXI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 52.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
- 18.8% revenue growth vs GLE's 10.7%
CLPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
- -78.5% 10Y total return vs GLE's -86.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 1.58x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% revenue growth vs GLE's 10.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.4% margin vs AIXI's -45.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs GLE's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -5.4% vs AIXI's -79.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.9% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 37.4% vs -34.4% |
GLE vs AIXI vs CLPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GLE vs AIXI vs CLPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GLE and AIXI and CLPS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 6.5x GLE's $46M. GLE is the more profitable business, keeping 1.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIXI's -45.9%. On growth, CLPS holds the edge at +15.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $115M | $299M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1M | -$49M | -$1M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $649,264 | -$53M | -$4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$18M | -$2M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +64.3% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | -44.2% | -1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | -45.9% | -1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -39.0% | -2.0% | -2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.2% | -64.9% | +15.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | -29.9% | +75.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $8M | $25M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8M | $53M | $31M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.71x | -0.45x | -3.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.11x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.39x | 0.11x | 0.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.47x | — | 0.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9999.00x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GLE leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GLE delivers a 1.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-6 for CLPS. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AIXI scores 4/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.0% | — | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | -65.3% | -3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +37.4% | -34.4% | -7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.2% | -3.4% | -9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $45M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $846,593 | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $46M | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1334.18x | -14.13x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLPS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLPS five years ago would be worth $3,073 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $138 for AIXI. Over the past 12 months, CLPS leads with a -5.4% total return vs AIXI's -79.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLPS at 0.2% vs AIXI's -75.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +45.6% | +68.1% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -68.4% | -79.2% | -5.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.9% | -98.6% | +0.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.9% | -98.6% | -69.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.9% | -98.6% | -78.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.2% | -75.9% | +0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GLE's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLPS currently trades 48.2% from its 52-week high vs GLE's 14.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.55x | 0.94x | 0.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.89 | $4.02 | $1.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.25 | $0.08 | $0.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +14.1% | +18.0% | +48.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.5 | 49.3 | 49.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.2M | 60.6M | 15K |
Analyst Outlook
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +14.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CLPS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). GLE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
GLE vs AIXI vs CLPS: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLE or AIXI or CLPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is the stronger pick with 18.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 7% for Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares (GLE). Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares (GLE) offers the better valuation at 30. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GLE or AIXI or CLPS?
Over the past 5 years, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) delivered a total return of -69.
3%, compared to -98. 6% for Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLPS returned -78. 5% versus AIXI's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GLE or AIXI or CLPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares's 1. 55β — meaning GLE is approximately 469% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — GLE or AIXI or CLPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is pulling ahead at 18.
8% versus 10. 7% for Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares (GLE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xiao-I Corporation grew EPS 52. 7% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIXI leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GLE or AIXI or CLPS?
Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares (GLE) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
2% net margin versus -20. 6% for Xiao-I Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLE leads at 5. 8% versus -18. 3% for AIXI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIXI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GLE or AIXI or CLPS?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
6% yield) pays a dividend. GLE, AIXI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is GLE or AIXI or CLPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27), 14. 6% yield). Global Engine Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares (GLE) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, GLE: -86. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GLE and AIXI and CLPS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GLE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS pays a dividend while GLE, AIXI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.