GMHS vs GDEV

For growth investors, GDEV Inc.

(GDEV) is the stronger pick with -9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 7% for Gamehaus Holdings Inc. (GMHS). GDEV Inc. (GDEV) offers the better valuation at 11. 8x trailing P/E (3. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GDEV Inc. (GDEV) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, GDEV Inc.

(GDEV) is the cheapest at 11. 8x versus Gamehaus Holdings Inc. at 13. 0x.

Over the past 5 years, GDEV Inc.

(GDEV) delivered a total return of -80. 2%, compared to -91. 2% for Gamehaus Holdings Inc. (GMHS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GDEV returned -79. 8% versus GMHS's -91. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gamehaus Holdings Inc.

(GMHS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 20β versus GDEV Inc. 's 0. 47β — meaning GDEV is approximately -339% more volatile than GMHS relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), GDEV Inc.

(GDEV) is pulling ahead at -9. 4% versus -18. 7% for Gamehaus Holdings Inc. (GMHS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GDEV Inc. grew EPS -40. 0% year-over-year, compared to -48. 7% for Gamehaus Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GDEV leads at -1. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

GDEV Inc.

(GDEV) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 1% net margin versus 3. 4% for Gamehaus Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GDEV leads at 9. 6% versus 2. 9% for GMHS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GDEV leads at 66. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Gamehaus Holdings Inc.

(GMHS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 20)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GMHS: -91. 2%, GDEV: -79. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.