GPK
Graphic Packaging Holding Company
Packaging & Containers
Market Cap$3.15B
5Y Perf.-26.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
GPK vs SLGN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
Packaging & Containers
Market Cap$4.25B
5Y Perf.+20.4%
GPK vs SLGN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | GPK | SLGN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $3.15B | $4.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.65B | $6.58B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $274M | $283M |
| Gross Margin | 13.4% | 17.4% |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | 9.8% |
| Forward P/E | 12.5x | 10.6x |
| Total Debt | $5.57B | $4.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $261M | $1.08B |
GPK vs SLGN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
GPK
SLGN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graphic Packaging H… (GPK) | 100 | 73.5 | -26.5% |
| Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) | 100 | 120.4 | +20.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GPK vs SLGN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SLGN leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Graphic Packaging Holding Company is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GPK
Graphic Packaging Holding Company
The Defensive Pick
GPK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, current ratio 1.30x
- Beta 0.95, yield 4.1%, current ratio 1.30x
- 4.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SLGN's 2.0%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick
SLGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 2.0%
- Rev growth 10.7%, EPS growth 4.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.4%
- 80.8% 10Y total return vs GPK's 9.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SLGN | 10.7% revenue growth vs GPK's -2.2% |
| Value | SLGN | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 12.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | SLGN | 4.3% margin vs GPK's 3.2% |
| Stability / Safety | SLGN | Beta 0.65 vs GPK's 0.95 |
| Dividends | GPK | 4.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SLGN's 2.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SLGN | -23.7% vs GPK's -50.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SLGN | 3.0% ROA vs GPK's 2.3%, ROIC 8.7% vs 7.7% |
GPK vs SLGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2022
FY 2025
GPK vs SLGN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSLGNLAGGINGGPK
GPKGraphic Packaging Hol…
1leads
SLGNSilgan Holdings Inc.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GPKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SLGN6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
GPK4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SLGN7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SLGN6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SLGN2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLGN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPK and SLGN operate at a comparable scale, with $8.7B and $6.6B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.3% (SLGN) to 3.2% (GPK). On growth, SLGN holds the edge at +6.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | GPKGraphic Packaging… | SLGNSilgan Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.7B | $6.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $966M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $274M | $283M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $293M | $307M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +17.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | +9.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.7% | +6.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -133.3% | -6.3% |
SLGN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
GPK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.2x trailing earnings, GPK trades at a 52% valuation discount to SLGN's 14.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GPK's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLGN's 8.0x.
| Metric | GPKGraphic Packaging… | SLGNSilgan Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $4.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.5B | $7.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.18x | 14.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.46x | 10.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.36x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.02x | 7.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.36x | 0.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 1.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.07x |
GPK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SLGN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SLGN delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $8 for GPK. GPK carries lower financial leverage with a 1.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLGN's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLGN scores 8/9 vs GPK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | GPKGraphic Packaging… | SLGNSilgan Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | +12.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.3% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.3% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.67x | 2.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.3B | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $261M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.6B | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.47x | 3.36x |
SLGN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SLGN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SLGN five years ago would be worth $10,179 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,462 for GPK. Over the past 12 months, SLGN leads with a -23.7% total return vs GPK's -50.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SLGN at -3.8% vs GPK's -22.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GPKGraphic Packaging… | SLGNSilgan Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.1% | -1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -50.4% | -23.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.2% | -11.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.4% | +1.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.6% | +80.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -22.9% | -3.8% |
SLGN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLGN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLGN is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPK's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLGN currently trades 70.6% from its 52-week high vs GPK's 44.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | GPKGraphic Packaging… | SLGNSilgan Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.76 | $57.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.79 | $36.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.7% | +70.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.7 | 49.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.1M | 766K |
SLGN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GPK and SLGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GPK as "Buy" and SLGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for SLGN (target: $51) vs 14.8% for GPK (target: $12). For income investors, GPK offers the higher dividend yield at 4.06% vs SLGN's 2.00%.
| Metric | GPKGraphic Packaging… | SLGNSilgan Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.20 | $50.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.43 | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.9% | +1.6% |
Evenly matched — GPK and SLGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
SLGN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GPK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallSilgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
GPK vs SLGN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GPK or SLGN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) is the stronger pick with 10. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK). Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) offers the better valuation at 7. 2x trailing P/E (12. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GPK or SLGN?
On trailing P/E, Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) is the cheapest at 7.
2x versus Silgan Holdings Inc. at 14. 9x. On forward P/E, Silgan Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GPK or SLGN?
Over the past 5 years, Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) delivered a total return of +1. 8%, compared to -35. 4% for Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SLGN returned +80. 8% versus GPK's +9. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GPK or SLGN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Graphic Packaging Holding Company's 0. 95β — meaning GPK is approximately 45% more volatile than SLGN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 167% versus 2% for Silgan Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GPK or SLGN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) is pulling ahead at 10. 7% versus -2. 2% for Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Silgan Holdings Inc. grew EPS 4. 7% year-over-year, compared to -31. 5% for Graphic Packaging Holding Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLGN leads at 0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GPK or SLGN?
Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
2% net margin versus 4. 4% for Silgan Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLGN leads at 10. 2% versus 10. 1% for GPK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GPK leads at 18. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GPK or SLGN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 12. 5x for Graphic Packaging Holding Company — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLGN: 25. 4% to $50. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — GPK or SLGN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 2. 0% for Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN).
09Is GPK or SLGN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLGN: +80. 8%, GPK: +9. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GPK and SLGN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(GPK: 1.7% · SLGN: 6.5%)Net Margin>
%
(GPK: 3.2% · SLGN: 4.3%)P/E Ratio<
x
(GPK: 7.2x · SLGN: 14.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.