Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SLGN vs SEE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.25B
5Y Perf.+20.4%
SEE
Sealed Air Corporation

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.21B
5Y Perf.+31.0%

SLGN vs SEE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SLGN logoSLGN
SEE logoSEE
IndustryPackaging & ContainersPackaging & Containers
Market Cap$4.25B$6.21B
Revenue (TTM)$6.58B$5.36B
Net Income (TTM)$283M$506M
Gross Margin17.4%29.8%
Operating Margin9.8%13.5%
Forward P/E10.6x12.4x
Total Debt$4.62B$4.10B
Cash & Equiv.$1.08B$344M

SLGN vs SEELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SLGN
SEE
StockMay 20May 26Return
Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN)100120.4+20.4%
Sealed Air Corporat… (SEE)100131.0+31.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SLGN vs SEE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SEE leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Silgan Holdings Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick

SLGN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 2.0%
  • Rev growth 10.7%, EPS growth 4.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.4%
  • 80.8% 10Y total return vs SEE's 4.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SEE
Sealed Air Corporation
The Quality Compounder

SEE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.

  • 9.4% margin vs SLGN's 4.3%
  • Beta 0.31 vs SLGN's 0.65
  • +39.8% vs SLGN's -23.7%
Best for: quality and stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSLGN logoSLGN10.7% revenue growth vs SEE's -0.6%
ValueSLGN logoSLGNLower P/E (10.6x vs 12.4x)
Quality / MarginsSEE logoSEE9.4% margin vs SLGN's 4.3%
Stability / SafetySEE logoSEEBeta 0.31 vs SLGN's 0.65
DividendsSLGN logoSLGN2.0% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs SEE's 1.9%
Momentum (1Y)SEE logoSEE+39.8% vs SLGN's -23.7%
Efficiency (ROA)SEE logoSEE7.1% ROA vs SLGN's 3.0%, ROIC 11.2% vs 8.7%

SLGN vs SEE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SLGNSilgan Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Metal Containers
48.4%$3.1B
Dispensing and Specialty Closures
41.8%$2.7B
Custom Containers
9.8%$638M
SEESealed Air Corporation
FY 2024
Food Care
66.4%$3.6B
Protective
33.6%$1.8B

SLGN vs SEE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSEELAGGINGSLGN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SEE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

SLGN and SEE operate at a comparable scale, with $6.6B and $5.4B in trailing revenue. SEE is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLGN's 4.3%. On growth, SLGN holds the edge at +6.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…SEE logoSEESealed Air Corpor…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6.6B$5.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$966M$965M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$283M$506M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$307M$459M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+17.4%+29.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+9.8%+13.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.3%+9.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.7%+8.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.5%+2.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.3%+16.4%
SEE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SLGN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.3x trailing earnings, SEE trades at a 18% valuation discount to SLGN's 14.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SLGN's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SEE's 14.3x.

MetricSLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…SEE logoSEESealed Air Corpor…
Market CapShares × price$4.3B$6.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7.8B$10.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS14.91x12.29x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.57x12.38x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate9.66x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.97x14.33x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.66x1.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.89x5.02x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.07x13.54x
SLGN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SEE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

SEE delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $12 for SLGN. SLGN carries lower financial leverage with a 2.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SEE's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLGN scores 8/9 vs SEE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…SEE logoSEESealed Air Corpor…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.5%+48.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.0%+7.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.7%+11.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.9%+14.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–985
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.03x3.31x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.5B$3.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.1B$344M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4.6B$4.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.36x1.95x
SEE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SEE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SLGN five years ago would be worth $10,179 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,122 for SEE. Over the past 12 months, SEE leads with a +39.8% total return vs SLGN's -23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SEE at 0.8% vs SLGN's -3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…SEE logoSEESealed Air Corpor…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-1.9%+2.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-23.7%+39.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-11.1%+2.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1.8%-18.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+80.8%+4.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-3.8%+0.8%
SEE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLGN's 0.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEE currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs SLGN's 70.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…SEE logoSEESealed Air Corpor…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.65x0.31x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$57.04$44.27
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$36.15$28.15
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+70.6%+95.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.664.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded766K3.0M
SEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SLGN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates SLGN as "Buy" and SEE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for SLGN (target: $51) vs 3.2% for SEE (target: $44). For income investors, SLGN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.00% vs SEE's 1.92%.

MetricSLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…SEE logoSEESealed Air Corpor…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$50.50$43.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts2127
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.0%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises210
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.80$0.81
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.6%0.0%
SLGN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SEE leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SLGN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallSealed Air Corporation (SEE)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SLGN vs SEE: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SLGN or SEE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Silgan Holdings Inc.

(SLGN) is the stronger pick with 10. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 6% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SLGN or SEE?

On trailing P/E, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the cheapest at 12.

3x versus Silgan Holdings Inc. at 14. 9x. On forward P/E, Silgan Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SLGN or SEE?

Over the past 5 years, Silgan Holdings Inc.

(SLGN) delivered a total return of +1. 8%, compared to -18. 8% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SLGN returned +80. 8% versus SEE's +4. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SLGN or SEE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

31β versus Silgan Holdings Inc. 's 0. 65β — meaning SLGN is approximately 108% more volatile than SEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for Sealed Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SLGN or SEE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silgan Holdings Inc.

(SLGN) is pulling ahead at 10. 7% versus -0. 6% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sealed Air Corporation grew EPS 89. 5% year-over-year, compared to 4. 7% for Silgan Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLGN leads at 0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SLGN or SEE?

Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the more profitable company, earning 9.

4% net margin versus 4. 4% for Silgan Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEE leads at 13. 5% versus 10. 2% for SLGN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SEE leads at 29. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SLGN or SEE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Silgan Holdings Inc.

(SLGN) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 12. 4x for Sealed Air Corporation — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLGN: 25. 4% to $50. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SLGN or SEE?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 1. 9% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE).

09

Is SLGN or SEE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

31), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEE: +4. 4%, SLGN: +80. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SLGN and SEE?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

SLGN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SEE

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SLGN and SEE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SLGN: 6.5% · SEE: 2.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(SLGN: 4.3% · SEE: 9.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SLGN: 14.9x · SEE: 12.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.