Asset Management - Global
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GROW vs CSWC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
GROW vs CSWC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management - Global | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $35M | $1.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $98K | $103M |
| Gross Margin | 41.7% | 66.5% |
| Operating Margin | -35.3% | 48.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.2x |
| Total Debt | $83K | $956M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $43M |
GROW vs CSWC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Global Investo… (GROW) | 100 | 124.4 | +24.4% |
| Capital Southwest C… (CSWC) | 100 | 173.8 | +73.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GROW vs CSWC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GROW is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 20.87x
- Beta 0.71, yield 3.5%, current ratio 20.87x
- Better valuation composite
CSWC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 10.1%
- Rev growth 7.7%, EPS growth -28.3%
- 232.4% 10Y total return vs GROW's 70.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.7% NII/revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs GROW's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs CSWC's 0.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 10.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs GROW's 3.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.7% vs GROW's +26.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs GROW's 0.8% |
GROW vs CSWC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GROW vs CSWC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSWC leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSWC is the larger business by revenue, generating $164M annually — 19.4x GROW's $8M. CSWC is the more profitable business, keeping 43.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GROW's -4.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $142M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $98,000 | $103M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$235,000 | -$69M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.7% | +66.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -35.3% | +48.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +43.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.8% | -132.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +113.3% |
Valuation Metrics
GROW leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35M | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -104.00x | 16.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.19x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.11x | 8.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.77x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GROW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSWC delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $0 for GROW. GROW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CSWC's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GROW scores 2/9 vs CSWC's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.2% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.7% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.2% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | $913M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $83,000 | $956M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 600.00x | 2.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CSWC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSWC five years ago would be worth $15,178 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,013 for GROW. Over the past 12 months, CSWC leads with a +34.7% total return vs GROW's +26.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSWC at 21.3% vs GROW's 0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.9% | +12.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.9% | +34.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.5% | +78.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.9% | +51.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.9% | +232.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.8% | +21.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GROW and CSWC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GROW is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSWC's 0.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSWC currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs GROW's 71.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.65 | $24.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.10 | $19.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.2% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.7 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25K | 663K |
Analyst Outlook
CSWC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CSWC offers the higher dividend yield at 10.07% vs GROW's 3.48%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +10.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | $2.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.7% | 0.0% |
CSWC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). GROW leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
GROW vs CSWC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GROW or CSWC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the stronger pick with 7.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) offers the better valuation at 16. 5x trailing P/E (10. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GROW or CSWC?
Over the past 5 years, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) delivered a total return of +51.
8%, compared to -59. 9% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSWC returned +232. 4% versus GROW's +70. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GROW or CSWC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), U.
S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Capital Southwest Corporation's 0. 84β — meaning CSWC is approximately 18% more volatile than GROW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 108% for Capital Southwest Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GROW or CSWC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is pulling ahead at 7.
7% versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Capital Southwest Corporation grew EPS -28. 3% year-over-year, compared to -126. 6% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GROW or CSWC?
Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the more profitable company, earning 43.
1% net margin versus -4. 0% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. — meaning it keeps 43. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSWC leads at 48. 5% versus -35. 3% for GROW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSWC leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GROW or CSWC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) offers the highest yield at 10. 1%, versus 3. 5% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW).
07Is GROW or CSWC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, U.
S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GROW: +70. 9%, CSWC: +232. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GROW and CSWC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GROW is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CSWC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.