Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GSIW vs UP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
GSIW vs UP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $450M | $218M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $736M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $-294M |
| Gross Margin | 4.7% | 2.2% |
| Operating Margin | -80.0% | -34.3% |
| Total Debt | $199K | $157M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $625K | $134M |
GSIW vs UP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Garden Stage Limite… (GSIW) | 100 | 1.8 | -98.2% |
| Wheels Up Experienc… (UP) | 100 | 8.8 | -91.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GSIW vs UP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GSIW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.04
- Rev growth 296.0%, EPS growth 3.4%
- -98.6% 10Y total return vs UP's -99.7%
UP is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- -39.9% margin vs GSIW's -79.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 296.0% NII/revenue growth vs UP's -7.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -39.9% margin vs GSIW's -79.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.04 vs UP's 2.50 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -66.7% vs UP's -71.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs UP's -29.1% |
GSIW vs UP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GSIW vs UP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UP is the larger business by revenue, generating $736M annually — 136.3x GSIW's $5M. UP is the more profitable business, keeping -39.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GSIW's -79.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $736M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | -$191M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | -$294M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | -$270M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +2.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -80.0% | -34.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -79.9% | -39.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -25.3% | -36.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -10.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.7% | +69.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GSIW and UP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $450M | $218M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $450M | $241M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -102.93x | -0.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 83.35x | 0.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 67.19x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GSIW leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GSIW scores 5/9 vs UP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.9% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.6% | -29.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.3% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -53.1% | -167.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$425,481 | $23M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $624,583 | $134M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $199,102 | $157M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -2.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GSIW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GSIW five years ago would be worth $141 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $30 for UP. Over the past 12 months, GSIW leads with a -66.7% total return vs UP's -71.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UP at -60.7% vs GSIW's -75.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.5% | -54.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -66.7% | -71.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | -93.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | -99.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | -99.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -75.8% | -60.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GSIW and UP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GSIW is the less volatile stock with a 2.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UP's 2.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.04x | 2.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $358.00 | $70.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.15 | $0.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.1% | +8.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.8 | 41.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 62K | 130K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $500.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
GSIW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). UP leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
GSIW vs UP: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GSIW or UP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) is the stronger pick with 296.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP). Analysts rate Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GSIW or UP?
Over the past 5 years, Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) delivered a total return of -98.
6%, compared to -99. 7% for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GSIW returned -98. 6% versus UP's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GSIW or UP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) is the lower-risk stock at 2.
04β versus Wheels Up Experience Inc. 's 2. 50β — meaning UP is approximately 23% more volatile than GSIW relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — GSIW or UP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) is pulling ahead at 296.
0% versus -7. 0% for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wheels Up Experience Inc. grew EPS 14. 3% year-over-year, compared to 3. 4% for Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GSIW or UP?
Wheels Up Experience Inc.
(UP) is the more profitable company, earning -39. 9% net margin versus -79. 9% for Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps -39. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UP leads at -34. 3% versus -80. 0% for GSIW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GSIW leads at 4. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GSIW or UP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is GSIW or UP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) carries a higher beta of 2. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GSIW: -98. 6%, UP: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GSIW and UP?
These companies operate in different sectors (GSIW (Financial Services) and UP (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GSIW is a small-cap high-growth stock; UP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.