Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GSIW vs UP vs FUTU vs FLYW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Financial - Capital Markets
Information Technology Services
GSIW vs UP vs FUTU vs FLYW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Financial - Capital Markets | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $457M | $242M | $51.52B | $2.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $736M | $13.59B | $188.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $-294M | $7.91B | $12.54B |
| Gross Margin | 4.7% | 2.2% | 82.0% | 0.2% |
| Operating Margin | -80.0% | -34.3% | 48.7% | 5.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 1.5x | 49.5x |
| Total Debt | $199K | $157M | $8.55B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $625K | $134M | $11.69B | $330M |
GSIW vs UP vs FUTU vs FLYW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Garden Stage Limite… (GSIW) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| Wheels Up Experienc… (UP) | 100 | 9.8 | -90.2% |
| Futu Holdings Limit… (FUTU) | 100 | 265.2 | +165.2% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 76.6 | -23.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GSIW vs UP vs FUTU vs FLYW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GSIW has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.04, Low D/E 3.0%, current ratio 1.51x
- 296.0% NII/revenue growth vs UP's -7.0%
- 6.6% ROA vs UP's -29.1%
UP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FUTU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs FLYW's -49.5%
- Lower P/E (1.5x vs 49.5x)
- 40.1% margin vs GSIW's -79.9%
FLYW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.32
- Rev growth 26.6%, EPS growth 391.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.1%
- Beta 1.32, current ratio 1.50x
- Beta 1.32 vs UP's 2.50
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 296.0% NII/revenue growth vs UP's -7.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.5x vs 49.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 40.1% margin vs GSIW's -79.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.32 vs UP's 2.50 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.7% vs UP's -71.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs UP's -29.1% |
GSIW vs UP vs FUTU vs FLYW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GSIW vs UP vs FUTU vs FLYW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FUTU leads in 2 of 6 categories
FLYW leads 1 • GSIW leads 0 • UP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUTU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 34907.2x GSIW's $5M. FUTU is the more profitable business, keeping 40.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GSIW's -79.9%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $736M | $13.6B | $188.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | -$191M | $10.0B | $10.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | -$294M | $7.9B | $12.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | -$270M | $0 | -$15.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +2.2% | +82.0% | +0.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -80.0% | -34.3% | +48.7% | +5.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -79.9% | -39.9% | +40.1% | +6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -25.3% | -36.7% | +2.3% | -8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -10.2% | — | +1408.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.7% | +69.2% | +112.0% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FUTU and FLYW each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.2x trailing earnings, FUTU trades at a 82% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FLYW's 47.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FUTU's 58.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $457M | $242M | $51.5B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $456M | $265M | $51.1B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -104.39x | -0.80x | 29.18x | 161.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 1.53x | 49.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.30x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 58.89x | 47.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 84.53x | 0.33x | 29.69x | 3.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 68.14x | — | 5.67x | 2.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 13.09x | 21.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GSIW and FUTU and FLYW each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GSIW delivers a 14.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $6 for FLYW. GSIW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUTU's 0.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLYW scores 6/9 vs UP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.9% | — | +26.4% | +5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.6% | -29.1% | +4.6% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.3% | — | +14.8% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -53.1% | -167.1% | +25.1% | +1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | — | 0.31x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$425,481 | $23M | -$3.1B | -$330M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $624,583 | $134M | $11.7B | $330M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $199,102 | $157M | $8.6B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -2.21x | — | 1.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUTU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUTU five years ago would be worth $11,495 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $34 for UP. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +62.7% total return vs UP's -71.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUTU at 53.6% vs GSIW's -75.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.1% | -49.2% | -17.4% | +27.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -64.8% | -71.4% | +45.1% | +62.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | -93.2% | +262.2% | -40.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | -99.7% | +15.0% | -49.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | -99.7% | +875.5% | -49.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -75.7% | -59.3% | +53.6% | -15.7% |
Risk & Volatility
FLYW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLYW is the less volatile stock with a 1.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UP's 2.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs GSIW's 8.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.04x | 2.50x | 2.04x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $358.00 | $70.00 | $202.53 | $18.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.15 | $0.75 | $99.20 | $9.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.2% | +9.6% | +71.5% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 38.9 | 65.0 | 83.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 62K | 131K | 1.4M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UP as "Hold", FUTU as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7373.8% upside for UP (target: $500) vs -1.3% for FLYW (target: $18).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $500.00 | $224.80 | $17.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 12 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.7% | 0.0% | +3.7% |
FUTU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FLYW leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
GSIW vs UP vs FUTU vs FLYW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GSIW or UP or FUTU or FLYW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) is the stronger pick with 296.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP). Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) offers the better valuation at 29. 2x trailing P/E (1. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GSIW or UP or FUTU or FLYW?
On trailing P/E, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is the cheapest at 29.
2x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, Futu Holdings Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GSIW or UP or FUTU or FLYW?
Over the past 5 years, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) delivered a total return of +15.
0%, compared to -99. 7% for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUTU returned +875. 5% versus UP's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GSIW or UP or FUTU or FLYW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
32β versus Wheels Up Experience Inc. 's 2. 50β — meaning UP is approximately 90% more volatile than FLYW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 31% for Futu Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GSIW or UP or FUTU or FLYW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) is pulling ahead at 296.
0% versus -7. 0% for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to 3. 4% for Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLYW leads at 29. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GSIW or UP or FUTU or FLYW?
Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is the more profitable company, earning 40.
1% net margin versus -79. 9% for Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 40. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUTU leads at 48. 7% versus -80. 0% for GSIW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUTU leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GSIW or UP or FUTU or FLYW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) trades at 1.
5x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 48. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UP: 7373. 8% to $500. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GSIW or UP or FUTU or FLYW?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is GSIW or UP or FUTU or FLYW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+875.
5% 10Y return). Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) carries a higher beta of 2. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUTU: +875. 5%, UP: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GSIW and UP and FUTU and FLYW?
These companies operate in different sectors (GSIW (Financial Services) and UP (Industrials) and FUTU (Financial Services) and FLYW (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GSIW is a small-cap high-growth stock; UP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FUTU is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.