Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GSUN vs COE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
GSUN vs COE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1M | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $29M | $81M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-11M |
| Gross Margin | 12.0% | 75.3% |
| Operating Margin | -19.9% | -11.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 446.1x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $840K | $28M |
GSUN vs COE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golden Sun Educatio… (GSUN) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| 51Talk Online Educa… (COE) | 100 | 457.4 | +357.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GSUN vs COE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GSUN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.58
- Lower volatility, beta 0.58, current ratio 0.76x
- Beta 0.58, current ratio 0.76x
COE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 87.0%, EPS growth 50.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 300.7%
- -66.7% 10Y total return vs GSUN's -99.7%
- 87.0% revenue growth vs GSUN's 65.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 87.0% revenue growth vs GSUN's 65.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -13.4% margin vs GSUN's -36.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.58 vs COE's 1.01 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.5% vs GSUN's -85.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -21.0% ROA vs GSUN's -42.7% |
GSUN vs COE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GSUN vs COE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COE leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COE is the larger business by revenue, generating $81M annually — 2.8x GSUN's $29M. COE is the more profitable business, keeping -13.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GSUN's -36.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $29M | $81M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | -$9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$20M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +75.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.9% | -11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -36.2% | -13.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -68.3% | +10.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | — |
Valuation Metrics
COE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5M | -$23M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.28x | -0.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 446.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | 0.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.56x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 0.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
COE leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), COE scores 5/9 vs GSUN's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -154.8% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -42.7% | -21.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -57.4% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -42.2% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 10.96x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | -$25M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $839,622 | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.16x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in COE five years ago would be worth $3,289 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $33 for GSUN. Over the past 12 months, COE leads with a +31.5% total return vs GSUN's -85.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COE at 60.6% vs GSUN's -65.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -54.1% | -19.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -85.2% | +31.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.8% | +313.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -67.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -66.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -65.2% | +60.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GSUN and COE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GSUN is the less volatile stock with a 0.58 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COE's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COE currently trades 45.0% from its 52-week high vs GSUN's 14.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.58x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.78 | $56.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.31 | $15.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +14.1% | +45.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.2 | 53.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 9K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
COE leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
GSUN vs COE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GSUN or COE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is the stronger pick with 87.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 65. 0% for Golden Sun Education Group Limited (GSUN). Analysts rate 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GSUN or COE?
Over the past 5 years, 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) delivered a total return of -67.
1%, compared to -99. 7% for Golden Sun Education Group Limited (GSUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COE returned -66. 7% versus GSUN's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GSUN or COE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Golden Sun Education Group Limited (GSUN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
58β versus 51Talk Online Education Group's 1. 01β — meaning COE is approximately 74% more volatile than GSUN relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — GSUN or COE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is pulling ahead at 87.
0% versus 65. 0% for Golden Sun Education Group Limited (GSUN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: 51Talk Online Education Group grew EPS 50. 0% year-over-year, compared to 39. 3% for Golden Sun Education Group Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, COE leads at 300. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GSUN or COE?
51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is the more profitable company, earning -14.
3% net margin versus -36. 5% for Golden Sun Education Group Limited — meaning it keeps -14. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COE leads at -15. 9% versus -25. 2% for GSUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COE leads at 78. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GSUN or COE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is GSUN or COE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Golden Sun Education Group Limited (GSUN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
58)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GSUN: -99. 7%, COE: -66. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GSUN and COE?
These companies operate in different sectors (GSUN (Consumer Defensive) and COE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.