Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GTEN vs GHC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
GTEN vs GHC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $93M | $4.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $3.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-65K | $298M |
| Gross Margin | — | 27.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.0x |
| Total Debt | $120K | $1.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3K | $267M |
GTEN vs GHC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gores Holdings X, I… (GTEN) | 100 | 101.5 | +1.5% |
| Graham Holdings Com… (GHC) | 100 | 118.1 | +18.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GTEN vs GHC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, GTEN is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
GHC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 147.0% 10Y total return vs GTEN's 1.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 35.6%, current ratio 1.75x
- Beta 0.87, yield 0.6%, current ratio 1.75x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.7% vs GTEN's +1.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.7% ROA vs GTEN's -7.0% |
GTEN vs GHC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GTEN vs GHC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GHC and GTEN operate at a comparable scale, with $3.7B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $394M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $298M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $286M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +27.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +7.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +7.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +7.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +805.7% |
Valuation Metrics
GTEN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $93M | $4.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $93M | $6.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6088.24x | 16.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 6.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GTEN and GHC each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GHC scores 5/9 vs GTEN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +6.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.0% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +3.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $117,226 | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2,774 | $267M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $120,000 | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 10.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GHC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GHC five years ago would be worth $17,634 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,157 for GTEN. Over the past 12 months, GHC leads with a +17.7% total return vs GTEN's +1.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GHC at 25.7% vs GTEN's 0.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.3% | +4.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.6% | +17.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.6% | +98.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.6% | +76.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.6% | +147.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.5% | +25.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GTEN and GHC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTEN is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GHC's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.04x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.32 | $1224.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.12 | $882.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.4% | +92.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.2 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 81K | 19K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
GHC is the only dividend payer here at 0.64% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $7.17 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
GTEN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). GHC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
GTEN vs GHC: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GTEN or GHC a better buy right now?
Graham Holdings Company (GHC) offers the better valuation at 17.
0x trailing P/E (17. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GTEN or GHC?
Over the past 5 years, Graham Holdings Company (GHC) delivered a total return of +76.
3%, compared to +1. 6% for Gores Holdings X, Inc. (GTEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GHC returned +147. 0% versus GTEN's +1. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GTEN or GHC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gores Holdings X, Inc.
(GTEN) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 04β versus Graham Holdings Company's 0. 87β — meaning GHC is approximately -2357% more volatile than GTEN relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — GTEN or GHC?
Graham Holdings Company (GHC) is the more profitable company, earning 6.
0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Gores Holdings X, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GHC leads at 5. 1% versus 0. 0% for GTEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GHC leads at 27. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — GTEN or GHC?
In this comparison, GHC (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. GTEN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is GTEN or GHC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gores Holdings X, Inc.
(GTEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 04)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTEN: +1. 6%, GHC: +147. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between GTEN and GHC?
These companies operate in different sectors (GTEN (Financial Services) and GHC (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GTEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GHC is a small-cap deep-value stock. GHC pays a dividend while GTEN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare GHC vs NYT
NYT is one of the most direct listed alternatives to GHC.
Compare GTEN vs ACIC
ACIC overlaps with GTEN in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With NYT + NWS
NYT and NWS are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.