Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
GURE vs IOSP vs ASIX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals
GURE vs IOSP vs ASIX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals |
| Market Cap | $4M | $1.92B | $835M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14M | $1.78B | $1.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-27M | $117M | $49M |
| Gross Margin | -82.1% | 27.7% | 10.8% |
| Operating Margin | -116.6% | 8.7% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.7x | 16.5x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $90M | $381M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $293M | $20M |
GURE vs IOSP vs ASIX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE) | 100 | 8.7 | -91.3% |
| Innospec Inc. (IOSP) | 100 | 100.8 | +0.8% |
| AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) | 100 | 212.5 | +112.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GURE vs IOSP vs ASIX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GURE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 0.98x
- Beta 0.52 vs ASIX's 0.81, lower leverage
IOSP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth -3.7%, EPS growth 228.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.3%
- 83.8% 10Y total return vs ASIX's 67.5%
ASIX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth and momentum.
- 0.3% revenue growth vs GURE's -74.5%
- +13.8% vs GURE's -38.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.3% revenue growth vs GURE's -74.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.7x vs 16.5x), PEG 0.49 vs 8.78 | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.6% margin vs GURE's -195.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs ASIX's 0.81, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ASIX's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.8% vs GURE's -38.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs GURE's -16.6%, ROIC 10.7% vs -11.2% |
GURE vs IOSP vs ASIX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GURE vs IOSP vs ASIX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IOSP leads in 2 of 6 categories
GURE leads 0 • ASIX leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IOSP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IOSP is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 127.7x GURE's $14M. IOSP is the more profitable business, keeping 6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GURE's -195.8%. On growth, GURE holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14M | $1.8B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1M | $198M | $143M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$27M | $117M | $49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$498,990 | $88M | $6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -82.1% | +27.7% | +10.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -116.6% | +8.7% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -195.8% | +6.6% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +4.9% | +0.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | -2.4% | +9.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +98.1% | +167.7% | -8.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GURE and IOSP each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.0x trailing earnings, ASIX trades at a 16% valuation discount to IOSP's 16.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IOSP offers better value at 0.52x vs ASIX's 7.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $1.9B | $835M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $1.7B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.07x | 16.63x | 13.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.66x | 16.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.52x | 7.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.37x | 8.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 1.08x | 0.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 1.37x | 0.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.87x | 130.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IOSP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IOSP delivers a 8.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-19 for GURE. GURE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ASIX's 0.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IOSP scores 6/9 vs GURE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.2% | +8.2% | +6.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.6% | +6.4% | +2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.2% | +10.7% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.6% | +11.0% | +5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.06x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$203M | $361M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $293M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $90M | $381M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -268.95x | — | 7.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — IOSP and ASIX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASIX five years ago would be worth $8,852 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $577 for GURE. Over the past 12 months, ASIX leads with a +13.8% total return vs GURE's -38.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IOSP at -5.8% vs GURE's -49.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.0% | +1.8% | +47.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -38.5% | -14.2% | +13.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.1% | -16.3% | -22.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.2% | -17.5% | -11.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.8% | +83.8% | +67.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.5% | -5.8% | -8.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GURE and ASIX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GURE is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASIX's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASIX currently trades 94.1% from its 52-week high vs GURE's 31.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 0.70x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.83 | $95.55 | $26.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.04 | $65.58 | $14.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.7% | +81.3% | +94.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.4 | 61.9 | 70.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 61K | 223K | 453K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IOSP and ASIX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IOSP as "Hold", ASIX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.1% upside for IOSP (target: $115) vs -12.6% for ASIX (target: $22). For income investors, ASIX offers the higher dividend yield at 2.50% vs IOSP's 2.18%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $115.00 | $22.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.2% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 12 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.70 | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
IOSP leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
GURE vs IOSP vs ASIX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GURE or IOSP or ASIX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the stronger pick with 0. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 5% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GURE or IOSP or ASIX?
On trailing P/E, AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the cheapest at 14. 0x versus Innospec Inc. at 16. 6x. On forward P/E, Innospec Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Innospec Inc. wins at 0. 49x versus AdvanSix Inc. 's 8. 78x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GURE or IOSP or ASIX?
Over the past 5 years, AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) delivered a total return of -11. 5%, compared to -94. 2% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IOSP returned +83. 8% versus GURE's -94. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GURE or IOSP or ASIX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gulf Resources, Inc.
(GURE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus AdvanSix Inc. 's 0. 81β — meaning ASIX is approximately 56% more volatile than GURE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 47% for AdvanSix Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GURE or IOSP or ASIX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is pulling ahead at 0. 3% versus -74. 5% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innospec Inc. grew EPS 228. 9% year-over-year, compared to 7. 3% for Gulf Resources, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IOSP leads at -3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GURE or IOSP or ASIX?
Innospec Inc.
(IOSP) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 6% net margin versus -769. 3% for Gulf Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IOSP leads at 8. 8% versus -277. 8% for GURE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IOSP leads at 27. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GURE or IOSP or ASIX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Innospec Inc. (IOSP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 49x versus AdvanSix Inc. 's 8. 78x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Innospec Inc. (IOSP) trades at 15. 7x forward P/E versus 16. 5x for AdvanSix Inc. — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IOSP: 48. 1% to $115. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GURE or IOSP or ASIX?
In this comparison, ASIX (2.
5% yield), IOSP (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. GURE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GURE or IOSP or ASIX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Innospec Inc.
(IOSP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), 2. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IOSP: +83. 8%, GURE: -94. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GURE and IOSP and ASIX?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GURE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IOSP is a small-cap deep-value stock; ASIX is a small-cap deep-value stock. IOSP, ASIX pay a dividend while GURE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.