GXO vs EXPD

For growth investors, GXO Logistics, Inc.

(GXO) is the stronger pick with 12. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 4% for Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD). Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) offers the better valuation at 25. 4x trailing P/E (25. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GXO Logistics, Inc. (GXO) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(EXPD) is the cheapest at 25. 4x versus GXO Logistics, Inc. at 178. 3x. On forward P/E, GXO Logistics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(EXPD) delivered a total return of +36. 7%, compared to -8. 4% for GXO Logistics, Inc. (GXO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXPD returned +236. 2% versus GXO's -8. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(EXPD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus GXO Logistics, Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning GXO is approximately 93% more volatile than EXPD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 3% for GXO Logistics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), GXO Logistics, Inc.

(GXO) is pulling ahead at 12. 5% versus 4. 4% for Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. grew EPS 4. 0% year-over-year, compared to -75. 0% for GXO Logistics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GXO leads at 13. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(EXPD) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus 0. 2% for GXO Logistics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXPD leads at 9. 5% versus 3. 2% for GXO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXPD leads at 15. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, GXO Logistics, Inc.

(GXO) trades at 16. 6x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. — 8. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GXO: 45. 7% to $72. 71.

In this comparison, EXPD (1.

0% yield) pays a dividend. GXO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(EXPD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 1. 0% yield, +236. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXPD: +236. 2%, GXO: -8. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

EXPD pays a dividend while GXO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.