GYRO vs RILY vs HNNA

For growth investors, Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

(HNNA) is the stronger pick with 19. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 5% for BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY). BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY) offers the better valuation at 1. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, BRC Group Holdings, Inc.

(RILY) is the cheapest at 1. 2x versus Hennessy Advisors, Inc. at 7. 8x.

Over the past 5 years, Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

(HNNA) delivered a total return of +34. 5%, compared to -62. 0% for BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RILY returned +252. 0% versus HNNA's -34. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

(HNNA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus BRC Group Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning RILY is approximately 569% more volatile than HNNA relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

(HNNA) is pulling ahead at 19. 9% versus -11. 5% for BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BRC Group Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 129. 9% year-over-year, compared to 38. 0% for Hennessy Advisors, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

BRC Group Holdings, Inc.

(RILY) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 8% net margin versus 0. 0% for Gyrodyne, LLC — meaning it keeps 29. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HNNA leads at 37. 0% versus -1. 2% for GYRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GYRO leads at 99. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, HNNA (5.

4% yield) pays a dividend. GYRO, RILY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

(HNNA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 30), 5. 4% yield). BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HNNA: -34. 6%, RILY: +252. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (GYRO (Real Estate) and RILY (Financial Services) and HNNA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GYRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RILY is a small-cap deep-value stock; HNNA is a small-cap high-growth stock. HNNA pays a dividend while GYRO, RILY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.