Specialty Retail
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
HEPS vs SE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
HEPS vs SE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $888M | $50.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $79.46B | $22.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5.53B | $1.59B |
| Gross Margin | 31.9% | 44.7% |
| Operating Margin | -2.4% | 8.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.6x |
| Total Debt | $3.20B | $3.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11.51B | $6.38B |
HEPS vs SE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-Market Elektronik… (HEPS) | 100 | 21.3 | -78.7% |
| Sea Limited (SE) | 100 | 30.0 | -70.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HEPS vs SE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HEPS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.90
- Rev growth 61.0%, EPS growth -286.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, current ratio 0.89x
SE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 417.8% 10Y total return vs HEPS's -79.2%
- Better valuation composite
- 6.9% margin vs HEPS's -7.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 61.0% revenue growth vs SE's 36.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.9% margin vs HEPS's -7.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs SE's 1.58 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.1% vs SE's -46.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs HEPS's -17.7% |
HEPS vs SE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HEPS vs SE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HEPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $79.5B annually — 3.5x SE's $22.9B. SE is the more profitable business, keeping 6.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HEPS's -7.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $79.5B | $22.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $2.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5.5B | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.1B | $3.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | +44.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +8.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +13.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.0% | +38.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | +61.5% |
Valuation Metrics
SE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SE's 25.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HEPS's 26.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $888M | $50.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $709M | $47.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.70x | 32.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.47x | 25.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.45x | 2.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 20.40x | 4.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.79x | 11.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SE leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SE delivers a 15.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-2 for HEPS. SE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HEPS's 1.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SE scores 8/9 vs HEPS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.4% | +15.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.7% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +14.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -54.3% | +14.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.59x | 0.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8.3B | -$3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11.5B | $6.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.2B | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.33x | 60.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HEPS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SE five years ago would be worth $2,993 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,085 for HEPS. Over the past 12 months, HEPS leads with a -1.1% total return vs SE's -46.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HEPS at 32.6% vs SE's 8.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.4% | -36.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.1% | -46.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +133.3% | +27.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.2% | -70.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.2% | +417.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.6% | +8.4% |
Risk & Volatility
HEPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HEPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SE's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HEPS currently trades 84.1% from its 52-week high vs SE's 41.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 1.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.33 | $199.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.15 | $77.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.1% | +41.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.8 | 46.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 301K | 3.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HEPS as "Hold" and SE as "Buy".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $139.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
SE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HEPS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
HEPS vs SE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HEPS or SE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.
S. (HEPS) is the stronger pick with 61. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 36. 4% for Sea Limited (SE). Sea Limited (SE) offers the better valuation at 32. 9x trailing P/E (23. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sea Limited (SE) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HEPS or SE?
Over the past 5 years, Sea Limited (SE) delivered a total return of -70.
1%, compared to -79. 2% for D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A. S. (HEPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SE returned +417. 8% versus HEPS's -79. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HEPS or SE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.
S. (HEPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Sea Limited's 1. 58β — meaning SE is approximately 75% more volatile than HEPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sea Limited (SE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 159% for D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A. S. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HEPS or SE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.
S. (HEPS) is pulling ahead at 61. 0% versus 36. 4% for Sea Limited (SE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sea Limited grew EPS 245. 2% year-over-year, compared to -286. 4% for D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A. S.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HEPS leads at 33. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HEPS or SE?
Sea Limited (SE) is the more profitable company, earning 6.
9% net margin versus -6. 7% for D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A. S. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SE leads at 8. 1% versus -2. 4% for HEPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SE leads at 44. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — HEPS or SE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is HEPS or SE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.
S. (HEPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90)). Sea Limited (SE) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HEPS: -79. 2%, SE: +417. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between HEPS and SE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.