Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
HEPS logo
HEPS
SE logo
SE
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HEPS vs SE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HEPS
D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.S.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • TR
Market Cap$888M
5Y Perf.-78.7%
SE
Sea Limited

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • SG
Market Cap$50.80B
5Y Perf.-70.0%

HEPS vs SE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HEPS logoHEPS
SE logoSE
IndustrySpecialty RetailSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$888M$50.80B
Revenue (TTM)$79.46B$22.94B
Net Income (TTM)$-5.53B$1.59B
Gross Margin31.9%44.7%
Operating Margin-2.4%8.5%
Forward P/E23.6x
Total Debt$3.20B$3.33B
Cash & Equiv.$11.51B$6.38B

HEPS vs SELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HEPS
SE
StockJul 21Jun 26Return
D-Market Elektronik… (HEPS)10021.3-78.7%
Sea Limited (SE)10030.0-70.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HEPS vs SE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HEPS and SE are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Sea Limited is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
HEPS
D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.S.
The Income Pick

HEPS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 0.90
  • Rev growth 61.0%, EPS growth -286.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.90, current ratio 0.89x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SE
Sea Limited
The Long-Run Compounder

SE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 417.8% 10Y total return vs HEPS's -79.2%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 6.9% margin vs HEPS's -7.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHEPS logoHEPS61.0% revenue growth vs SE's 36.4%
ValueSE logoSEBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsSE logoSE6.9% margin vs HEPS's -7.0%
Stability / SafetyHEPS logoHEPSBeta 0.90 vs SE's 1.58
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)HEPS logoHEPS-1.1% vs SE's -46.4%
Efficiency (ROA)SE logoSE6.0% ROA vs HEPS's -17.7%

HEPS vs SE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
HEPSD-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.S.
FY 2025
Sales of goods
64.6%$57.1B
Delivery service revenues
14.0%$12.4B
Marketplace revenues
11.2%$9.9B
Other
6.0%$5.3B
Advertising
2.4%$2.1B
Subscription service
1.9%$1.7B
SESea Limited
FY 2025
Third Party Customers
54.9%$787M
Inter-companies
45.1%$647M

HEPS vs SE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSELAGGINGHEPS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

HEPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $79.5B annually — 3.5x SE's $22.9B. SE is the more profitable business, keeping 6.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HEPS's -7.0%.

MetricHEPS logoHEPSD-Market Elektron…SE logoSESea Limited
RevenueTrailing 12 months$79.5B$22.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.2B$2.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$5.5B$1.6B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$4.1B$3.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+31.9%+44.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.4%+8.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.0%+6.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.1%+13.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+39.0%+38.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.8%+61.5%
SE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, SE's 25.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HEPS's 26.5x.

MetricHEPS logoHEPSD-Market Elektron…SE logoSESea Limited
Market CapShares × price$888M$50.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$709M$47.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-6.70x32.91x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.23.57x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.47x25.62x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.45x2.21x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share20.40x4.19x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.79x11.25x
SE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SE leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

SE delivers a 15.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-2 for HEPS. SE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HEPS's 1.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SE scores 8/9 vs HEPS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricHEPS logoHEPSD-Market Elektron…SE logoSESea Limited
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.4%+15.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-17.7%+6.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+14.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-54.3%+14.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–948
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.59x0.26x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$8.3B-$3.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$11.5B$6.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.2B$3.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.33x60.40x
SE leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HEPS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SE five years ago would be worth $2,993 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,085 for HEPS. Over the past 12 months, HEPS leads with a -1.1% total return vs SE's -46.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HEPS at 32.6% vs SE's 8.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHEPS logoHEPSD-Market Elektron…SE logoSESea Limited
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+9.4%-36.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-1.1%-46.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+133.3%+27.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.2%-70.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.2%+417.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+32.6%+8.4%
HEPS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

HEPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

HEPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SE's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HEPS currently trades 84.1% from its 52-week high vs SE's 41.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHEPS logoHEPSD-Market Elektron…SE logoSESea Limited
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.90x1.58x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.33$199.30
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.15$77.05
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+84.1%+41.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.846.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded301K3.9M
HEPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates HEPS as "Hold" and SE as "Buy".

MetricHEPS logoHEPSD-Market Elektron…SE logoSESea Limited
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$139.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts244
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises9
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

SE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HEPS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallSea Limited (SE)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HEPS vs SE: Frequently Asked Questions

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HEPS or SE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.

S. (HEPS) is the stronger pick with 61. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 36. 4% for Sea Limited (SE). Sea Limited (SE) offers the better valuation at 32. 9x trailing P/E (23. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sea Limited (SE) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — HEPS or SE?

Over the past 5 years, Sea Limited (SE) delivered a total return of -70.

1%, compared to -79. 2% for D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A. S. (HEPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SE returned +417. 8% versus HEPS's -79. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — HEPS or SE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.

S. (HEPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Sea Limited's 1. 58β — meaning SE is approximately 75% more volatile than HEPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sea Limited (SE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 159% for D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A. S. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — HEPS or SE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.

S. (HEPS) is pulling ahead at 61. 0% versus 36. 4% for Sea Limited (SE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sea Limited grew EPS 245. 2% year-over-year, compared to -286. 4% for D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A. S.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HEPS leads at 33. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — HEPS or SE?

Sea Limited (SE) is the more profitable company, earning 6.

9% net margin versus -6. 7% for D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A. S. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SE leads at 8. 1% versus -2. 4% for HEPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SE leads at 44. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — HEPS or SE?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

07

Is HEPS or SE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.

S. (HEPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90)). Sea Limited (SE) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HEPS: -79. 2%, SE: +417. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between HEPS and SE?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.