Specialty Retail
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
HEPS vs SE vs MELI vs BABA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
HEPS vs SE vs MELI vs BABA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $888M | $50.80B | $80.59B | $263.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $79.46B | $22.94B | $31.80B | $1.02T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5.53B | $1.59B | $1.92B | $103.59B |
| Gross Margin | 31.9% | 44.7% | 43.9% | 39.8% |
| Operating Margin | -2.4% | 8.5% | 9.6% | 5.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.6x | 40.2x | 2.6x |
| Total Debt | $3.20B | $3.33B | $11.39B | $259.02B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11.51B | $6.38B | $3.67B | $172.92B |
HEPS vs SE vs MELI vs BABA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-Market Elektronik… (HEPS) | 100 | 21.3 | -78.7% |
| Sea Limited (SE) | 100 | 30.0 | -70.0% |
| MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) | 100 | 101.3 | +1.3% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 57.8 | -42.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HEPS vs SE vs MELI vs BABA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HEPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, current ratio 0.89x
- Beta 0.90, current ratio 0.89x
- 61.0% revenue growth vs BABA's 2.7%
- Beta 0.90 vs SE's 1.58
SE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 1.58
- 6.0% ROA vs HEPS's -17.7%
MELI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 39.1%, EPS growth 4.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.9%
- 10.9% 10Y total return vs SE's 417.8%
BABA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (2.6x vs 23.6x)
- 10.1% margin vs HEPS's -7.0%
- 1.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- -0.6% vs SE's -46.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 61.0% revenue growth vs BABA's 2.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.6x vs 23.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.1% margin vs HEPS's -7.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs SE's 1.58 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -0.6% vs SE's -46.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs HEPS's -17.7% |
HEPS vs SE vs MELI vs BABA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HEPS vs SE vs MELI vs BABA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HEPS leads in 2 of 6 categories
MELI leads 1 • BABA leads 1 • SE leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MELI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BABA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.02T annually — 44.6x SE's $22.9B. BABA is the more profitable business, keeping 10.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HEPS's -7.0%. On growth, MELI holds the edge at +49.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $79.5B | $22.9B | $31.8B | $1.02T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $2.1B | $3.9B | $64.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5.5B | $1.6B | $1.9B | $103.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.1B | $3.2B | $10.7B | -$50.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | +44.7% | +43.9% | +39.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +8.5% | +9.6% | +5.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | +6.9% | +6.0% | +10.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +13.9% | +33.7% | -4.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.0% | +38.4% | +49.0% | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | +61.5% | -15.5% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BABA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.3x trailing earnings, BABA trades at a 57% valuation discount to MELI's 40.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BABA's 17.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HEPS's 26.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $888M | $50.8B | $80.6B | $263.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $709M | $47.8B | $88.3B | $276.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.70x | 32.91x | 40.36x | 17.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.57x | 40.22x | 2.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.47x | 25.62x | 23.41x | 17.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.45x | 2.21x | 2.79x | 1.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 20.40x | 4.19x | 11.94x | 1.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.79x | 11.25x | 7.48x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SE and MELI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MELI delivers a 29.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-2 for HEPS. BABA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MELI's 1.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SE scores 8/9 vs BABA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.4% | +15.2% | +29.6% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.7% | +6.0% | +4.8% | +5.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +14.1% | +20.8% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -54.3% | +14.3% | +28.3% | +4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.59x | 0.26x | 1.69x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8.3B | -$3.0B | $7.7B | $86.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11.5B | $6.4B | $3.7B | $172.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.2B | $3.3B | $11.4B | $259.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.33x | 60.40x | 14.14x | 14.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HEPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MELI five years ago would be worth $11,096 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,085 for HEPS. Over the past 12 months, BABA leads with a -0.6% total return vs SE's -46.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HEPS at 32.6% vs SE's 8.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.4% | -36.9% | -19.5% | -26.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.1% | -46.4% | -32.9% | -0.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +133.3% | +27.5% | +28.4% | +38.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.2% | -70.1% | +11.0% | -44.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.2% | +417.8% | +1092.7% | +57.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.6% | +8.4% | +8.7% | +11.3% |
Risk & Volatility
HEPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HEPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SE's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HEPS currently trades 84.1% from its 52-week high vs SE's 41.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 1.58x | 1.22x | 1.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.33 | $199.30 | $2645.22 | $192.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.15 | $77.05 | $1495.00 | $103.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.1% | +41.6% | +60.1% | +58.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.8 | 46.3 | 43.3 | 29.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 301K | 3.9M | 538K | 10.2M |
Analyst Outlook
SE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HEPS as "Hold", SE as "Buy", MELI as "Buy", BABA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 68.4% upside for SE (target: $140) vs 36.3% for MELI (target: $2167). BABA is the only dividend payer here at 1.84% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $139.67 | $2166.67 | $189.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 44 | 33 | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $14.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.0% | +0.4% |
HEPS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). MELI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
HEPS vs SE vs MELI vs BABA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HEPS or SE or MELI or BABA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.
S. (HEPS) is the stronger pick with 61. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) offers the better valuation at 17. 3x trailing P/E (2. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sea Limited (SE) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HEPS or SE or MELI or BABA?
On trailing P/E, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the cheapest at 17.
3x versus MercadoLibre, Inc. at 40. 4x. On forward P/E, Alibaba Group Holding Limited is actually cheaper at 2. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HEPS or SE or MELI or BABA?
Over the past 5 years, MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) delivered a total return of +11. 0%, compared to -79. 2% for D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A. S. (HEPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MELI returned +1093% versus HEPS's -79. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HEPS or SE or MELI or BABA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.
S. (HEPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Sea Limited's 1. 58β — meaning SE is approximately 75% more volatile than HEPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 169% for MercadoLibre, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HEPS or SE or MELI or BABA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.
S. (HEPS) is pulling ahead at 61. 0% versus 2. 7% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sea Limited grew EPS 245. 2% year-over-year, compared to -286. 4% for D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A. S.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MELI leads at 38. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HEPS or SE or MELI or BABA?
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
1% net margin versus -6. 7% for D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A. S. — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MELI leads at 11. 1% versus -2. 4% for HEPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SE leads at 44. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HEPS or SE or MELI or BABA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) trades at 2.
6x forward P/E versus 40. 2x for MercadoLibre, Inc. — 37. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SE: 68. 4% to $139. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — HEPS or SE or MELI or BABA?
In this comparison, BABA (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. HEPS, SE, MELI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HEPS or SE or MELI or BABA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22), +1093% 10Y return). Sea Limited (SE) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MELI: +1093%, SE: +417. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HEPS and SE and MELI and BABA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HEPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MELI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock. BABA pays a dividend while HEPS, SE, MELI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.