Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
HMR vs INSW vs TNK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
HMR vs INSW vs TNK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $49M | $4.46B | $2.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $44M | $676M | $952M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $546M | $351M |
| Gross Margin | 52.1% | 40.6% | 27.5% |
| Operating Margin | -1.5% | 44.4% | 27.5% |
| Forward P/E | 25.5x | 8.5x | 6.0x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $576M | $55M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $117M | $831M |
HMR vs INSW vs TNK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heidmar Maritime Ho… (HMR) | 100 | 37.5 | -62.5% |
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 270.6 | +170.6% |
| Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) | 100 | 215.3 | +115.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HMR vs INSW vs TNK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HMR plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.43, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth -11.4%, EPS growth -25.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.8%
- 10.1% 10Y total return vs TNK's 187.7%
TNK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 2.7%, current ratio 7.98x
- Beta 0.35, yield 2.4%, current ratio 7.98x
- Lower P/E (6.0x vs 8.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -11.4% revenue growth vs HMR's -41.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 8.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 80.8% margin vs HMR's -42.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs HMR's 0.80, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, vs TNK's 2.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +160.2% vs HMR's -62.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.1% ROA vs HMR's -32.5%, ROIC 9.4% vs 41.5% |
HMR vs INSW vs TNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HMR vs INSW vs TNK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $952M annually — 21.9x HMR's $44M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 80.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HMR's -42.6%. On growth, TNK holds the edge at -26.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $44M | $676M | $952M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $465M | $348M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | $546M | $351M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | $193M | $113M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.1% | +40.6% | +27.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | +44.4% | +27.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -42.6% | +80.8% | +36.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +28.5% | +11.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -91.3% | -26.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.8% | +46.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TNK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.0x trailing earnings, TNK trades at a 68% valuation discount to HMR's 25.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TNK's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than INSW's 10.5x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $49M | $4.5B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34M | $4.9B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.54x | 14.48x | 8.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.52x | 6.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.17x | 10.48x | 6.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.69x | 5.29x | 2.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.68x | 2.21x | 1.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.53x | 117.08x | 25.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HMR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSW delivers a 27.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-104 for HMR. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INSW's 0.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HMR scores 6/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -103.7% | +27.1% | +17.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -32.5% | +20.1% | +15.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +41.5% | +9.4% | +12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.1% | +12.1% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 0.29x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | $459M | -$776M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $117M | $831M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $576M | $55M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.13x | 0.90x | 109.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,438 for HMR. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +160.2% total return vs HMR's -62.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 40.9% vs HMR's -47.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.2% | +96.5% | +58.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -62.6% | +160.2% | +80.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.6% | +179.7% | +136.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.6% | +438.1% | +513.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.6% | +1014.5% | +187.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -47.6% | +40.9% | +33.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INSW and TNK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TNK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HMR's 0.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INSW currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs HMR's 29.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.43x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.86 | $91.58 | $83.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.73 | $35.60 | $41.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.9% | +98.5% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.0 | 67.3 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 96K | 597K | 542K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HMR and INSW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INSW as "Buy", TNK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.7% upside for TNK (target: $90) vs -7.6% for INSW (target: $83). For income investors, INSW offers the higher dividend yield at 3.23% vs TNK's 2.44%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $83.33 | $90.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.92 | $1.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
INSW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TNK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
HMR vs INSW vs TNK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HMR or INSW or TNK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger pick with -11. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -41. 0% for Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (HMR). Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HMR or INSW or TNK?
On trailing P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the cheapest at 8. 0x versus Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. at 25. 5x. On forward P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HMR or INSW or TNK?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 8%, compared to -85. 6% for Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (HMR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +1015% versus HMR's -85. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HMR or INSW or TNK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. 's 0. 80β — meaning HMR is approximately 127% more volatile than TNK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 29% for International Seaways, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HMR or INSW or TNK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is pulling ahead at -11. 4% versus -41. 0% for Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (HMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Tankers Ltd. grew EPS -13. 0% year-over-year, compared to -90. 1% for Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HMR leads at 82. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HMR or INSW or TNK?
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 9% net margin versus 6. 6% for Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 36. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 14. 1% for HMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HMR leads at 59. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HMR or INSW or TNK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 8. 5x for International Seaways, Inc. — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNK: 10. 7% to $90. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HMR or INSW or TNK?
In this comparison, INSW (3.
2% yield), TNK (2. 4% yield) pay a dividend. HMR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HMR or INSW or TNK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 2% yield, +1015% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +1015%, HMR: -85. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HMR and INSW and TNK?
These companies operate in different sectors (HMR (Industrials) and INSW (Energy) and TNK (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INSW is a small-cap deep-value stock; TNK is a small-cap deep-value stock. INSW, TNK pay a dividend while HMR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.