Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
HNVR vs DCOM vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HNVR vs DCOM vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $167M | $1.64B | $203M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $143M | $730M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $111M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 43.9% | 56.1% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 21.5% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 10.7x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $136M | $371M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $209M | $2.35B | $119M |
HNVR vs DCOM vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hanover Bancorp, In… (HNVR) | 100 | 113.6 | +13.6% |
| Dime Community Banc… (DCOM) | 100 | 118.3 | +18.3% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 156.2 | +56.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HNVR vs DCOM vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HNVR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (9.4x vs 11.8x)
DCOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 330.9%
- PEG 1.68 vs CZWI's 2.32
- 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 1.8%
- 156.6% 10Y total return vs DCOM's 67.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 11.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs DCOM's 1.05 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.8% vs HNVR's +4.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
HNVR vs DCOM vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HNVR vs DCOM vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DCOM leads in 2 of 6 categories
CZWI leads 1 • HNVR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DCOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $730M annually — 8.1x CZWI's $90M. CZWI is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HNVR's 5.2%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $143M | $730M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $13M | $161M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $111M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $182M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.9% | +56.1% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +21.5% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +15.2% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +25.0% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.2% | +2.3% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HNVR and DCOM each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, CZWI trades at a 38% valuation discount to HNVR's 23.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DCOM offers better value at 2.46x vs CZWI's 2.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $167M | $1.6B | $203M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $94M | -$345M | $136M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.30x | 15.69x | 14.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.36x | 10.69x | 11.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.46x | 2.84x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.47x | -2.20x | 15.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.17x | 2.24x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.87x | 1.08x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.80x | 8.98x | 19.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DCOM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CZWI delivers a 7.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $4 for HNVR. DCOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HNVR's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DCOM scores 8/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.8% | +7.7% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | +0.8% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.2% | +5.6% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +6.1% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.68x | 0.25x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$83M | -$2.0B | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $209M | $2.4B | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $136M | $371M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.14x | 0.57x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,345 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,801 for HNVR. Over the past 12 months, DCOM leads with a +45.8% total return vs HNVR's +4.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.4% vs HNVR's 10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.8% | +26.2% | +21.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.5% | +45.8% | +42.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.1% | +128.6% | +159.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.0% | +24.3% | +73.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.0% | +67.4% | +156.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.8% | +31.7% | +37.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DCOM and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DCOM's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DCOM currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 93.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 1.05x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.49 | $37.77 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.91 | $24.57 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.1% | +98.5% | +93.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.4 | 55.4 | 66.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 269K | 41K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DCOM and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HNVR as "Buy", DCOM as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.7% upside for HNVR (target: $27) vs 6.2% for DCOM (target: $40). For income investors, DCOM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.68% vs HNVR's 1.73%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.50 | $39.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 10 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +2.7% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | $1.00 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | 0.0% | +3.1% |
DCOM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CZWI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
HNVR vs DCOM vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HNVR or DCOM or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hanover Bancorp, Inc. (HNVR) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HNVR or DCOM or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus Hanover Bancorp, Inc. at 23. 3x. On forward P/E, Hanover Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. wins at 1. 68x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HNVR or DCOM or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +73. 4%, compared to +18. 0% for Hanover Bancorp, Inc. (HNVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +156. 6% versus HNVR's +18. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HNVR or DCOM or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 05β — meaning DCOM is approximately 128% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 68% for Hanover Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HNVR or DCOM or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 330. 9% year-over-year, compared to -39. 8% for Hanover Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HNVR or DCOM or CZWI?
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 0% net margin versus 5. 2% for Hanover Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DCOM leads at 21. 5% versus 6. 9% for HNVR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DCOM leads at 56. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HNVR or DCOM or CZWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 68x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Hanover Bancorp, Inc. (HNVR) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HNVR: 13. 7% to $26. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — HNVR or DCOM or CZWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 1. 7% for Hanover Bancorp, Inc. (HNVR).
09Is HNVR or DCOM or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +156. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +156. 6%, DCOM: +67. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HNVR and DCOM and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HNVR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DCOM is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.