Banks - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HSBC vs C
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
HSBC vs C — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $314.12B | $222.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $147.86B | $170.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22.29B | $14.69B |
| Gross Margin | 54.6% | 41.7% |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | 10.0% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $495.79B | $590.56B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $286.92B | $276.53B |
HSBC vs C — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) | 100 | 396.5 | +296.5% |
| Citigroup Inc. (C) | 100 | 266.3 | +166.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HSBC vs C
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HSBC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 3.6%
- 268.7% 10Y total return vs C's 229.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, current ratio 2.62x
C carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 9.9%, EPS growth 47.3%
- NIM 2.3% vs HSBC's 1.1%
- 9.9% NII/revenue growth vs HSBC's 3.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.9% NII/revenue growth vs HSBC's 3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 11.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HSBC's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs C's 1.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, vs C's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.1% vs HSBC's +68.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HSBC's 0.3% |
HSBC vs C — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HSBC vs C — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HSBC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
C and HSBC operate at a comparable scale, with $170.7B and $147.9B in trailing revenue. HSBC is the more profitable business, keeping 15.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to C's 7.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $147.9B | $170.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $35.8B | $24.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22.3B | $14.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$76.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.6% | +41.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.3% | +10.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.1% | +7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.0% | -15.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.5% | +23.2% |
Valuation Metrics
HSBC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.1x trailing earnings, HSBC trades at a 30% valuation discount to C's 21.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HSBC's 16.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than C's 25.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $314.1B | $222.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $523.0B | $537.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.11x | 21.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.04x | 11.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.34x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.37x | 25.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.12x | 1.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.73x | 1.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.51x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HSBC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HSBC delivers a 11.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $7 for C. HSBC carries lower financial leverage with a 2.68x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to C's 2.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HSBC scores 6/9 vs C's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.4% | +6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.0% | +1.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.68x | 2.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $208.9B | $314.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $286.9B | $276.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $495.8B | $590.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.47x | 0.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HSBC and C each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HSBC five years ago would be worth $33,318 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,509 for C. Over the past 12 months, C leads with a +87.1% total return vs HSBC's +68.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors C at 42.6% vs HSBC's 39.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.4% | +8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +68.0% | +87.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +168.4% | +189.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +233.2% | +85.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +268.7% | +229.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.0% | +42.6% |
Risk & Volatility
HSBC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HSBC is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than C's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $94.80 | $135.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.21 | $69.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.4% | +94.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.7 | 58.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 11.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HSBC and C each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HSBC as "Hold" and C as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.1% upside for C (target: $140) vs -43.1% for HSBC (target: $52). For income investors, HSBC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.61% vs C's 2.14%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $52.00 | $140.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.6% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.30 | $2.73 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.0% | +3.4% |
HSBC leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
HSBC vs C: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HSBC or C a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Citigroup Inc.
(C) is the stronger pick with 9. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 2% for HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC). HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citigroup Inc. (C) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HSBC or C?
On trailing P/E, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) is the cheapest at 15.
1x versus Citigroup Inc. at 21. 4x. On forward P/E, HSBC Holdings plc is actually cheaper at 11. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HSBC or C?
Over the past 5 years, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) delivered a total return of +233.
2%, compared to +85. 1% for Citigroup Inc. (C). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HSBC returned +268. 7% versus C's +229. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HSBC or C?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
12β versus Citigroup Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning C is approximately 35% more volatile than HSBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Citigroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HSBC or C?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Citigroup Inc.
(C) is pulling ahead at 9. 9% versus 3. 2% for HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Citigroup Inc. grew EPS 47. 3% year-over-year, compared to -2. 4% for HSBC Holdings plc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HSBC or C?
HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
1% net margin versus 7. 4% for Citigroup Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HSBC leads at 20. 3% versus 10. 0% for C. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HSBC leads at 54. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HSBC or C more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) trades at 11.
0x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citigroup Inc. — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for C: 10. 1% to $140. 42.
08Which pays a better dividend — HSBC or C?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 2. 1% for Citigroup Inc. (C).
09Is HSBC or C better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
12), 3. 6% yield, +268. 7% 10Y return). Citigroup Inc. (C) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HSBC: +268. 7%, C: +229. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HSBC and C?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HSBC is a large-cap deep-value stock; C is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.