Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HUBB vs ROK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
HUBB vs ROK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $26.71B | $51.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.00B | $8.80B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $906M | $1.09B |
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | 52.5% |
| Operating Margin | 20.8% | 19.1% |
| Forward P/E | 25.5x | 37.8x |
| Total Debt | $2.61B | $3.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $483M | $468M |
HUBB vs ROK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) | 100 | 410.3 | +310.3% |
| Rockwell Automation… (ROK) | 100 | 212.5 | +112.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HUBB vs ROK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HUBB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 15.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.7%
- 413.6% 10Y total return vs ROK's 347.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.38, Low D/E 67.6%, current ratio 1.72x
ROK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 20 yrs, beta 1.33, yield 1.1%
- Beta 1.33, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.14x
- Beta 1.33 vs HUBB's 1.38
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.8% revenue growth vs ROK's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.5x vs 37.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.1% margin vs ROK's 12.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.33 vs HUBB's 1.38 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 20-year raise streak, vs HUBB's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.7% vs HUBB's +45.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.6% ROA vs ROK's 9.7%, ROIC 17.1% vs 15.1% |
HUBB vs ROK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HUBB vs ROK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROK and HUBB operate at a comparable scale, with $8.8B and $6.0B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.1% (HUBB) to 12.4% (ROK).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.0B | $8.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.5B | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $906M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $909M | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.5% | +52.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.8% | +19.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.1% | +12.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.1% | +11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.3% | +39.6% |
Valuation Metrics
HUBB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.4x trailing earnings, HUBB trades at a 49% valuation discount to ROK's 59.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HUBB's 21.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ROK's 31.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $26.7B | $51.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28.8B | $54.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.37x | 59.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.48x | 37.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.46x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.17x | 31.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.57x | 6.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.97x | 14.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.53x | 38.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HUBB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ROK delivers a 29.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $24 for HUBB. HUBB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.68x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ROK's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ROK scores 8/9 vs HUBB's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.4% | +29.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.6% | +9.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.1% | +15.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.1% | +18.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.68x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | $3.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $483M | $468M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.6B | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 16.90x | 9.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HUBB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HUBB five years ago would be worth $26,328 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,015 for ROK. Over the past 12 months, ROK leads with a +83.7% total return vs HUBB's +45.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HUBB at 24.1% vs ROK's 19.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.8% | +15.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.8% | +83.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +91.3% | +68.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +163.3% | +80.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +413.6% | +347.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.1% | +19.1% |
Risk & Volatility
ROK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ROK is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUBB's 1.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ROK currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs HUBB's 88.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $565.50 | $463.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $346.07 | $250.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.8% | +99.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.2 | 68.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 542K | 836K |
Analyst Outlook
ROK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HUBB as "Hold" and ROK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.5% upside for HUBB (target: $535) vs -5.0% for ROK (target: $437). For income investors, ROK offers the higher dividend yield at 1.14% vs HUBB's 1.07%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $535.14 | $436.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 20 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.35 | $5.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +0.8% |
ROK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). HUBB leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
HUBB vs ROK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HUBB or ROK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the stronger pick with 3.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK). Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) offers the better valuation at 30. 4x trailing P/E (25. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) a "Hold" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HUBB or ROK?
On trailing P/E, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the cheapest at 30.
4x versus Rockwell Automation, Inc. at 59. 9x. On forward P/E, Hubbell Incorporated is actually cheaper at 25. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HUBB or ROK?
Over the past 5 years, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) delivered a total return of +163.
3%, compared to +80. 1% for Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUBB returned +413. 6% versus ROK's +347. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HUBB or ROK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rockwell Automation, Inc.
(ROK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 33β versus Hubbell Incorporated's 1. 38β — meaning HUBB is approximately 4% more volatile than ROK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 68% versus 98% for Rockwell Automation, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HUBB or ROK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is pulling ahead at 3.
8% versus 1. 0% for Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hubbell Incorporated grew EPS 15. 1% year-over-year, compared to -7. 4% for Rockwell Automation, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HUBB leads at 5. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HUBB or ROK?
Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
2% net margin versus 10. 4% for Rockwell Automation, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUBB leads at 20. 8% versus 17. 1% for ROK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ROK leads at 48. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HUBB or ROK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) trades at 25.
5x forward P/E versus 37. 8x for Rockwell Automation, Inc. — 12. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HUBB: 6. 5% to $535. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — HUBB or ROK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) offers the highest yield at 1. 1%, versus 1. 1% for Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB).
09Is HUBB or ROK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
1% yield, +413. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUBB: +413. 6%, ROK: +347. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HUBB and ROK?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.