Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IESC vs WLDN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
IESC vs WLDN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $13.43B | $1.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.49B | $682M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $341M | $53M |
| Gross Margin | 25.8% | 37.5% |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | 6.5% |
| Forward P/E | 38.4x | 18.4x |
| Total Debt | $158M | $69M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $127M | $66M |
IESC vs WLDN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) | 100 | 2879.7 | +2779.7% |
| Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) | 100 | 309.7 | +209.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IESC vs WLDN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IESC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.73
- 52.9% 10Y total return vs WLDN's 6.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.73, Low D/E 17.8%, current ratio 1.71x
WLDN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 120.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.7%
- Beta 1.96, current ratio 1.56x
- 20.5% revenue growth vs IESC's 16.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.5% revenue growth vs IESC's 16.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.4x vs 38.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.8% margin vs WLDN's 7.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.96 vs IESC's 2.73 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +182.8% vs WLDN's +88.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.4% ROA vs WLDN's 10.5%, ROIC 37.5% vs 11.5% |
IESC vs WLDN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IESC vs WLDN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WLDN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IESC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 5.1x WLDN's $682M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 9.8% (IESC) to 7.7% (WLDN). On growth, WLDN holds the edge at +20.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.5B | $682M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $425M | $63M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $341M | $53M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $224M | $71M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.8% | +37.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | +6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +7.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.2% | +20.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +65.8% | +132.1% |
Valuation Metrics
WLDN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.7x trailing earnings, WLDN trades at a 52% valuation discount to IESC's 44.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WLDN's 17.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IESC's 31.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.4B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.5B | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 44.86x | 21.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 38.37x | 18.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.90x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 31.27x | 17.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.98x | 1.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 15.32x | 3.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 61.36x | 15.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IESC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IESC delivers a 39.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $19 for WLDN. IESC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WLDN's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WLDN scores 7/9 vs IESC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +39.9% | +19.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +22.4% | +10.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +37.5% | +11.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +45.6% | +12.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $30M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $127M | $66M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $158M | $69M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 269.44x | 7.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IESC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IESC five years ago would be worth $130,060 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,918 for WLDN. Over the past 12 months, IESC leads with a +182.8% total return vs WLDN's +88.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IESC at 148.5% vs WLDN's 64.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +65.6% | -29.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +182.8% | +88.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1434.2% | +346.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1200.6% | +99.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5290.7% | +595.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +148.5% | +64.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IESC and WLDN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WLDN is the less volatile stock with a 1.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IESC's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IESC currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs WLDN's 55.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.73x | 1.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $688.51 | $137.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $233.71 | $39.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.9% | +55.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.4 | 48.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 211K | 342K |
Analyst Outlook
IESC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IESC as "Buy" and WLDN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.2% upside for WLDN (target: $118) vs -32.0% for IESC (target: $458).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $458.00 | $117.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% |
IESC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). WLDN leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
IESC vs WLDN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IESC or WLDN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is the stronger pick with 20. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 9% for IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (18. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IESC or WLDN?
On trailing P/E, Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is the cheapest at 21. 7x versus IES Holdings, Inc. at 44. 9x. On forward P/E, Willdan Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IESC or WLDN?
Over the past 5 years, IES Holdings, Inc.
(IESC) delivered a total return of +1201%, compared to +99. 2% for Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IESC returned +52. 9% versus WLDN's +595. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IESC or WLDN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 96β versus IES Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 73β — meaning IESC is approximately 39% more volatile than WLDN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 23% for Willdan Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IESC or WLDN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is pulling ahead at 20. 5% versus 16. 9% for IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Willdan Group, Inc. grew EPS 120. 9% year-over-year, compared to 51. 9% for IES Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WLDN leads at 16. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IESC or WLDN?
IES Holdings, Inc.
(IESC) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 1% net margin versus 7. 7% for Willdan Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IESC leads at 11. 4% versus 6. 5% for WLDN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WLDN leads at 37. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IESC or WLDN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) trades at 18. 4x forward P/E versus 38. 4x for IES Holdings, Inc. — 20. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WLDN: 55. 2% to $117. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — IESC or WLDN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is IESC or WLDN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+595. 2% 10Y return). IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) carries a higher beta of 2. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WLDN: +595. 2%, IESC: +52. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IESC and WLDN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.