Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IFRX vs ARGX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
IFRX vs ARGX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $192M | $48.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $28K | $5.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $1.95B |
| Gross Margin | -261.1% | 88.3% |
| Operating Margin | -1735.9% | 15.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 30.0x |
| Total Debt | $898K | $83M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $3.49B |
IFRX vs ARGX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| InflaRx N.V. (IFRX) | 100 | 30.0 | -70.0% |
| argenx SE (ARGX) | 100 | 359.0 | +259.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IFRX vs ARGX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IFRX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +77.9% vs ARGX's +26.4%
ARGX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.52
- Rev growth 90.1%, EPS growth 53.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 116.4%
- 33.2% 10Y total return vs IFRX's -82.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 90.1% revenue growth vs IFRX's -83.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.9% margin vs IFRX's -1.6K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs IFRX's 2.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.9% vs ARGX's +26.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 29.1% ROA vs IFRX's -62.4%, ROIC 18.3% vs -104.4% |
IFRX vs ARGX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARGX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARGX is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.6B annually — 198862.1x IFRX's $28,173. ARGX is the more profitable business, keeping 34.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IFRX's -1555.8%. On growth, ARGX holds the edge at +78.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $28,173 | $5.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$49M | $999M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$35M | $755M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -261.1% | +88.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1735.9% | +15.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1555.8% | +34.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1257.6% | +13.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -82.0% | +78.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -61.3% | +8.4% |
Valuation Metrics
IFRX leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $192M | $48.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $174M | $45.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.42x | 40.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 29.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 46.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5786.44x | 11.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.65x | 7.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 57.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARGX leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARGX delivers a 33.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-82 for IFRX. ARGX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IFRX's 0.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARGX scores 4/9 vs IFRX's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -81.8% | +33.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -62.4% | +29.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -104.4% | +18.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -94.0% | +15.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | -$3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $3.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $897,532 | $83M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1297.60x | 326.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARGX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARGX five years ago would be worth $29,856 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,320 for IFRX. Over the past 12 months, IFRX leads with a +77.9% total return vs ARGX's +26.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARGX at 24.7% vs IFRX's -13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +143.1% | -6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.9% | +26.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.4% | +93.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.8% | +198.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.3% | +3323.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.5% | +24.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IFRX and ARGX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARGX is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IFRX's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IFRX currently trades 90.1% from its 52-week high vs ARGX's 84.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.08x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.94 | $934.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.71 | $510.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.1% | +84.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 79.7 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 330K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IFRX as "Buy" and ARGX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.7% upside for ARGX (target: $1052) vs -24.5% for IFRX (target: $2).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.00 | $1052.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARGX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IFRX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
IFRX vs ARGX: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IFRX or ARGX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, argenx SE (ARGX) is the stronger pick with 90.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -83. 0% for InflaRx N. V. (IFRX). argenx SE (ARGX) offers the better valuation at 40. 1x trailing P/E (30. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate InflaRx N. V. (IFRX) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IFRX or ARGX?
Over the past 5 years, argenx SE (ARGX) delivered a total return of +198.
6%, compared to -26. 8% for InflaRx N. V. (IFRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARGX returned +33. 2% versus IFRX's -82. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IFRX or ARGX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), argenx SE (ARGX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
52β versus InflaRx N. V. 's 2. 08β — meaning IFRX is approximately 296% more volatile than ARGX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, argenx SE (ARGX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for InflaRx N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IFRX or ARGX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), argenx SE (ARGX) is pulling ahead at 90.
1% versus -83. 0% for InflaRx N. V. (IFRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: argenx SE grew EPS 53. 6% year-over-year, compared to 15. 4% for InflaRx N. V.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IFRX or ARGX?
argenx SE (ARGX) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
1% net margin versus -1555. 8% for InflaRx N. V. — meaning it keeps 31. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARGX leads at 23. 4% versus -1735. 9% for IFRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARGX leads at 89. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is IFRX or ARGX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARGX: 33.
7% to $1052. 30.
07Which pays a better dividend — IFRX or ARGX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is IFRX or ARGX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, argenx SE (ARGX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
52)). InflaRx N. V. (IFRX) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARGX: +33. 2%, IFRX: -82. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IFRX and ARGX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IFRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARGX is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.