Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
INDO vs CHNR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
INDO vs CHNR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $47M | $42M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $-14M |
| Gross Margin | -10.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -173.4% | — |
| Total Debt | $882K | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $3M |
INDO vs CHNR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indonesia Energy Co… (INDO) | 100 | 81.1 | -18.9% |
| China Natural Resou… (CHNR) | 100 | 13.3 | -86.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INDO vs CHNR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INDO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -24.3%, EPS growth -138.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.8%
- -70.7% 10Y total return vs CHNR's -93.5%
- Lower volatility, beta -2.13, Low D/E 4.8%, current ratio 3.18x
CHNR is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 0.0% margin vs INDO's -173.0%
- -5.3% ROA vs INDO's -40.4%, ROIC -0.0% vs -31.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -24.3% revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.0% margin vs INDO's -173.0% | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.8% vs CHNR's -2.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -5.3% ROA vs INDO's -40.4%, ROIC -0.0% vs -31.5% |
INDO vs CHNR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHNR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INDO and CHNR operate at a comparable scale, with $4M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | -$14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -10.7% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -173.4% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -173.0% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -146.4% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.3% | +91.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — INDO and CHNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $47M | $42M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $43M | $41M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.06x | -88.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 17.64x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.75x | 3.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHNR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHNR delivers a -15.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-16 in annual profit, vs $-50 for INDO. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INDO scores 3/9 vs CHNR's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -49.7% | -15.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -40.4% | -5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -31.5% | -0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -32.9% | -0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$3M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $881,639 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -263.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INDO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INDO five years ago would be worth $5,793 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $721 for CHNR. Over the past 12 months, INDO leads with a +19.8% total return vs CHNR's -2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INDO at -12.6% vs CHNR's -41.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | +22.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.8% | -2.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.2% | -79.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.1% | -92.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.7% | -93.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.6% | -41.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INDO and CHNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INDO is the less volatile stock with a -2.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHNR's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHNR currently trades 52.4% from its 52-week high vs INDO's 36.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -2.13x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.50 | $8.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.25 | $3.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.9% | +52.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.4 | 55.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 893K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CHNR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). INDO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
INDO vs CHNR: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — INDO or CHNR?
Over the past 5 years, Indonesia Energy Corporation Limited (INDO) delivered a total return of -42.
1%, compared to -92. 8% for China Natural Resources, Inc. (CHNR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INDO returned -70. 7% versus CHNR's -93. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — INDO or CHNR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Indonesia Energy Corporation Limited (INDO) is the lower-risk stock at -2.
13β versus China Natural Resources, Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning CHNR is approximately -153% more volatile than INDO relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — INDO or CHNR?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: China Natural Resources, Inc.
grew EPS 95. 9% year-over-year, compared to -138. 5% for Indonesia Energy Corporation Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — INDO or CHNR?
China Natural Resources, Inc.
(CHNR) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -237. 8% for Indonesia Energy Corporation Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHNR leads at 0. 0% versus -222. 4% for INDO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHNR leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — INDO or CHNR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is INDO or CHNR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Indonesia Energy Corporation Limited (INDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -2.
13)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INDO: -70. 7%, CHNR: -93. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between INDO and CHNR?
These companies operate in different sectors (INDO (Energy) and CHNR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.