Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
IPGP vs LITE vs NPKI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
IPGP vs LITE vs NPKI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Communication Equipment | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $4.43B | $64.50B | $1.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.04B | $2.49B | $287M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $29M | $440M | $36M |
| Gross Margin | 37.6% | 37.7% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 0.3% | 9.5% | 11.4% |
| Forward P/E | 78.1x | 110.1x | 28.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2.61B | $37M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $404M | $521M | $5M |
IPGP vs LITE vs NPKI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IPG Photonics Corpo… (IPGP) | 100 | 133.9 | +33.9% |
| Lumentum Holdings I… (LITE) | 100 | 1038.8 | +938.8% |
| NPK International I… (NPKI) | 100 | 178.8 | +78.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IPGP vs LITE vs NPKI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IPGP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.68
- Beta 1.68, current ratio 6.08x
LITE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 36.8% 10Y total return vs NPKI's 85.5%
- 17.7% margin vs IPGP's 2.8%
- +12.8% vs IPGP's +77.9%
NPKI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 27.4%, EPS growth 124.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 10.4%, current ratio 1.43x
- 27.4% revenue growth vs IPGP's 2.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.4% revenue growth vs IPGP's 2.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (28.1x vs 110.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.7% margin vs IPGP's 2.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.27 vs LITE's 2.66, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.8% vs IPGP's +77.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs IPGP's 1.2%, ROIC -4.3% vs 0.6% |
IPGP vs LITE vs NPKI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IPGP vs LITE vs NPKI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LITE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LITE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 8.7x NPKI's $287M. LITE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IPGP's 2.8%. On growth, LITE holds the edge at +90.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $2.5B | $287M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $55M | $425M | $53M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $29M | $440M | $36M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $399M | $32M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.6% | +37.7% | +35.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +9.5% | +11.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +17.7% | +12.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +16.0% | +11.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.6% | +90.1% | +15.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -54.4% | +3.3% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NPKI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 35.6x trailing earnings, NPKI trades at a 99% valuation discount to LITE's 2441.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NPKI's 17.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LITE's 869.4x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.4B | $64.5B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $66.6B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 143.14x | 2441.70x | 35.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 78.05x | 110.06x | 28.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 50.42x | 869.35x | 17.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.42x | 39.21x | 4.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.09x | 55.41x | 3.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 48.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NPKI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LITE delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $1 for IPGP. NPKI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LITE's 2.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LITE scores 7/9 vs IPGP's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.4% | +30.7% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +8.5% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | -4.3% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.6% | -4.8% | +12.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.30x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$404M | $2.1B | $31M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $404M | $521M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2.6B | $37M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 9.62x | 77.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LITE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LITE five years ago would be worth $111,852 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,573 for IPGP. Over the past 12 months, LITE leads with a +1275.9% total return vs IPGP's +77.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LITE at 166.2% vs IPGP's -3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.6% | +134.0% | +23.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.9% | +1275.9% | +85.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.2% | +1786.5% | +85.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.3% | +1018.5% | +85.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.6% | +3680.0% | +85.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.5% | +166.2% | +22.9% |
Risk & Volatility
NPKI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NPKI is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LITE's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NPKI currently trades 90.6% from its 52-week high vs IPGP's 67.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 2.66x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $155.82 | $1021.00 | $16.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $58.09 | $63.98 | $7.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.1% | +88.5% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.5 | 53.3 | 53.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 504K | 6.5M | 768K |
Analyst Outlook
IPGP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IPGP as "Buy", LITE as "Buy", NPKI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.2% upside for IPGP (target: $141) vs 1.7% for LITE (target: $919).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $141.25 | $918.67 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 25 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +0.1% | +1.8% |
NPKI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). LITE leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns).
IPGP vs LITE vs NPKI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IPGP or LITE or NPKI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NPK International Inc.
(NPKI) is the stronger pick with 27. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP). NPK International Inc. (NPKI) offers the better valuation at 35. 6x trailing P/E (28. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IPGP or LITE or NPKI?
On trailing P/E, NPK International Inc.
(NPKI) is the cheapest at 35. 6x versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. at 2441. 7x. On forward P/E, NPK International Inc. is actually cheaper at 28. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IPGP or LITE or NPKI?
Over the past 5 years, Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) delivered a total return of +1019%, compared to -44. 3% for IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LITE returned +36. 8% versus IPGP's +23. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IPGP or LITE or NPKI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NPK International Inc.
(NPKI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 27β versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning LITE is approximately 110% more volatile than NPKI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NPK International Inc. (NPKI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 2% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IPGP or LITE or NPKI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NPK International Inc.
(NPKI) is pulling ahead at 27. 4% versus 2. 7% for IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NPK International Inc. grew EPS 124. 0% year-over-year, compared to 104. 6% for Lumentum Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NPKI leads at 12. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IPGP or LITE or NPKI?
NPK International Inc.
(NPKI) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 0% net margin versus 1. 6% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NPKI leads at 16. 9% versus -10. 9% for LITE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IPGP leads at 38. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IPGP or LITE or NPKI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NPK International Inc.
(NPKI) trades at 28. 1x forward P/E versus 110. 1x for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — 82. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IPGP: 35. 2% to $141. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — IPGP or LITE or NPKI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is IPGP or LITE or NPKI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NPK International Inc.
(NPKI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 27)). Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NPKI: +85. 5%, LITE: +36. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IPGP and LITE and NPKI?
These companies operate in different sectors (IPGP (Technology) and LITE (Technology) and NPKI (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IPGP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LITE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NPKI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.