Steel
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KBSX vs FFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
KBSX vs FFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Steel | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $9M | $4.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $44M | $739M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 43.4% | 70.8% |
| Operating Margin | -10.5% | 36.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $197M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $763M |
KBSX vs FFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FST Corp. (KBSX) | 100 | 12.9 | -87.1% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 89.8 | -10.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KBSX vs FFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KBSX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.55
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth -9.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, Low D/E 67.0%, current ratio 1.21x
FFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 146.6% 10Y total return vs KBSX's -89.3%
- 30.2% margin vs KBSX's -21.3%
- 2.2% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs FFIN's 18.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.2% margin vs KBSX's -21.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs FFIN's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -2.5% vs KBSX's -33.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.6% ROA vs KBSX's -15.4%, ROIC 11.0% vs -8.1% |
KBSX vs FFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KBSX vs FFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $739M annually — 16.8x KBSX's $44M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KBSX's -21.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $44M | $739M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $310M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $290M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.4% | +70.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.5% | +36.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -21.3% | +30.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +39.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +34.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -148.1% | -7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
KBSX leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19M | $4.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.68x | 20.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.01x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.25x | 6.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.39x | 2.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-88 for KBSX. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KBSX's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FFIN scores 6/9 vs KBSX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -87.6% | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.4% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.1% | +11.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.3% | +16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.67x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10M | -$566M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $763M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $197M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.49x | 1.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FFIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FFIN five years ago would be worth $7,104 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,066 for KBSX. Over the past 12 months, FFIN leads with a -2.5% total return vs KBSX's -33.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FFIN at 9.1% vs KBSX's -52.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.4% | +9.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.3% | -2.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.3% | +29.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.3% | -29.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.3% | +146.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.6% | +9.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KBSX and FFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KBSX is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FFIN's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FFIN currently trades 84.2% from its 52-week high vs KBSX's 50.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.52 | $38.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.04 | $28.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.0% | +84.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.1 | 55.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 130K | 735K |
Analyst Outlook
FFIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
FFIN is the only dividend payer here at 2.20% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $39.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +52.9% | 0.0% |
FFIN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KBSX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
KBSX vs FFIN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KBSX or FFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FST Corp.
(KBSX) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 18. 8% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) offers the better valuation at 20. 9x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) a "Hold" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KBSX or FFIN?
Over the past 5 years, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) delivered a total return of -29. 0%, compared to -89. 3% for FST Corp. (KBSX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FFIN returned +145. 4% versus KBSX's -89. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KBSX or FFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FST Corp.
(KBSX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning FFIN is approximately 73% more volatile than KBSX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 67% for FST Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — KBSX or FFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FST Corp.
(KBSX) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus 18. 8% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 12. 2% year-over-year, compared to -902. 1% for FST Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KBSX or FFIN?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus -8. 9% for FST Corp. — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus -10. 0% for KBSX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — KBSX or FFIN?
In this comparison, FFIN (2.
2% yield) pays a dividend. KBSX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is KBSX or FFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 2. 2% yield, +145. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FFIN: +145. 4%, KBSX: -89. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between KBSX and FFIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (KBSX (Basic Materials) and FFIN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
FFIN pays a dividend while KBSX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.