Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KC vs JD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
KC vs JD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $4.08B | $47.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.02B | $1.30T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-971M | $32.20B |
| Gross Margin | 16.2% | 12.7% |
| Operating Margin | -8.3% | 1.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 1.5x |
| Total Debt | $5.20B | $89.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.65B | $108.35B |
KC vs JD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kingsoft Cloud Hold… (KC) | 100 | 82.6 | -17.4% |
| JD.com, Inc. (JD) | 100 | 56.5 | -43.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KC vs JD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.5%, EPS growth 11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.5%
- 10.5% revenue growth vs JD's 6.8%
- +9.2% vs JD's -7.0%
JD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.06, yield 2.6%
- 40.2% 10Y total return vs KC's -30.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 28.7%, current ratio 1.29x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.5% revenue growth vs JD's 6.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.5% margin vs KC's -10.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs KC's 2.01, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.2% vs JD's -7.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs KC's -3.8%, ROIC 9.9% vs -17.7% |
KC vs JD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KC vs JD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — KC and JD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.30T annually — 144.5x KC's $9.0B. JD is the more profitable business, keeping 2.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KC's -10.8%. On growth, KC holds the edge at +33.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.0B | $1.30T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $23.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$971M | $32.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$343M | $9.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +12.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.3% | +1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.8% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +0.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.7% | +14.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +99.6% | -56.3% |
Valuation Metrics
JD leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.1B | $47.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.4B | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.00x | 7.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 1.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.57x | 0.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.05x | 1.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JD leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JD delivers a 10.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-14 for KC. JD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KC's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JD scores 6/9 vs KC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.7% | +10.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.8% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -17.7% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -20.9% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.94x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.5B | -$18.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.6B | $108.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.2B | $89.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.40x | 12.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JD five years ago would be worth $4,625 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,053 for KC. Over the past 12 months, KC leads with a +9.2% total return vs JD's -7.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KC at 43.9% vs JD's -2.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +52.1% | +7.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.2% | -7.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +198.0% | -6.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.5% | -53.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.2% | +40.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +43.9% | -2.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KC and JD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JD is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KC's 2.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KC currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs JD's 80.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.01x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.38 | $38.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.29 | $24.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.5% | +80.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 49.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 10.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KC as "Buy" and JD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.1% upside for JD (target: $33) vs -6.2% for KC (target: $16). JD is the only dividend payer here at 2.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.60 | $32.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.1% |
JD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). KC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
KC vs JD: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KC or JD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) is the stronger pick with 10.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 8% for JD. com, Inc. (JD). JD. com, Inc. (JD) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E (1. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KC or JD?
Over the past 5 years, JD.
com, Inc. (JD) delivered a total return of -53. 8%, compared to -59. 5% for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JD returned +40. 2% versus KC's -30. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KC or JD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 06β versus Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited's 2. 01β — meaning KC is approximately 89% more volatile than JD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, JD. com, Inc. (JD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 94% for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — KC or JD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) is pulling ahead at 10.
5% versus 6. 8% for JD. com, Inc. (JD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JD. com, Inc. grew EPS 76. 5% year-over-year, compared to 11. 5% for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, JD leads at 6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KC or JD?
JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 6% net margin versus -25. 3% for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 3. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JD leads at 3. 3% versus -22. 3% for KC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KC leads at 17. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is KC or JD more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JD: 7.
1% to $32. 86.
07Which pays a better dividend — KC or JD?
In this comparison, JD (2.
6% yield) pays a dividend. KC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is KC or JD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 06), 2. 6% yield). Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) carries a higher beta of 2. 01 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JD: +40. 2%, KC: -30. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between KC and JD?
These companies operate in different sectors (KC (Technology) and JD (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JD is a mid-cap deep-value stock. JD pays a dividend while KC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare JD vs BABA
BABA is one of the most direct listed alternatives to JD.
Compare KC vs BIDU
Chinese tech company with cloud services (Baidu AI Cloud), direct China cloud competitor
Expand With BABA + BIDU
BABA and BIDU are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.