KMT
Kennametal Inc.
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Market Cap$3.30B
5Y Perf.+56.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
KMT vs GTLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$9.94B
5Y Perf.+429.3%
KMT vs GTLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | KMT | GTLS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $3.30B | $9.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.14B | $4.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $137M | $40M |
| Gross Margin | 31.9% | 32.6% |
| Operating Margin | 9.5% | 8.5% |
| Forward P/E | 17.7x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $643M | $3.74B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $141M | $366M |
KMT vs GTLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
KMT
GTLS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kennametal Inc. (KMT) | 100 | 156.0 | +56.0% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 529.3 | +429.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KMT vs GTLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: KMT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Chart Industries, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
KMT
Kennametal Inc.
The Income Pick
KMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.31, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, Low D/E 48.6%, current ratio 2.46x
- Beta 1.31, yield 1.8%, current ratio 2.46x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play
GTLS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 2.5%, EPS growth -92.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.3%
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs KMT's 115.9%
- 2.5% revenue growth vs KMT's -3.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GTLS | 2.5% revenue growth vs KMT's -3.9% |
| Value | GTLS | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 17.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | KMT | 6.4% margin vs GTLS's 0.9% |
| Stability / Safety | GTLS | Beta 0.56 vs KMT's 1.31 |
| Dividends | KMT | 1.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GTLS's 0.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | KMT | +122.4% vs GTLS's +37.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | KMT | 5.3% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 5.9% vs 7.4% |
KMT vs GTLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
KMT vs GTLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLKMTLAGGINGGTLS
GTLSChart Industries, Inc.
1leads
KMTKennametal Inc.
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GTLSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
KMT4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
KMT5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
KMT7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
KMT4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
GTLS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
KMT2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 2.0x KMT's $2.1B. KMT is the more profitable business, keeping 6.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GTLS's 0.9%. On growth, KMT holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | KMTKennametal Inc. | GTLSChart Industries,… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $238M | $644M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $137M | $40M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $73M | $203M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | +32.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +8.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +0.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.8% | -2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +82.9% | -36.1% |
KMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
KMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.1x trailing earnings, KMT trades at a 94% valuation discount to GTLS's 629.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KMT's 13.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GTLS's 14.3x.
| Metric | KMTKennametal Inc. | GTLSChart Industries,… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $9.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.8B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 36.06x | 629.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.74x | 16.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.59x | 14.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.68x | 2.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.54x | 2.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.63x | 49.04x |
KMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KMT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KMT delivers a 10.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $1 for GTLS. KMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTLS's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KMT scores 6/9 vs GTLS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | KMTKennametal Inc. | GTLSChart Industries,… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.1% | +1.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | +7.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.49x | 1.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $503M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $141M | $366M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $643M | $3.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.29x | 1.08x |
KMT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GTLS five years ago would be worth $13,325 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,287 for KMT. Over the past 12 months, KMT leads with a +122.4% total return vs GTLS's +37.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KMT at 19.3% vs GTLS's 17.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | KMTKennametal Inc. | GTLSChart Industries,… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +49.9% | +0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +122.4% | +37.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.6% | +63.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.9% | +33.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +115.9% | +740.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.3% | +17.7% |
KMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KMT's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | KMTKennametal Inc. | GTLSChart Industries,… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.81 | $208.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.62 | $140.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.8% | +99.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.9 | 50.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 1.6M |
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
KMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KMT as "Hold" and GTLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -6.7% upside for GTLS (target: $194) vs -16.8% for KMT (target: $36). For income investors, KMT offers the higher dividend yield at 1.84% vs GTLS's 0.29%.
| Metric | KMTKennametal Inc. | GTLSChart Industries,… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.00 | $193.81 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.79 | $0.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | 0.0% |
KMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
KMT leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GTLS leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
Best OverallKennametal Inc. (KMT)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
KMT vs GTLS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KMT or GTLS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger pick with 2. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Kennametal Inc. (KMT). Kennametal Inc. (KMT) offers the better valuation at 36. 1x trailing P/E (17. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KMT or GTLS?
On trailing P/E, Kennametal Inc.
(KMT) is the cheapest at 36. 1x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 629. 6x. On forward P/E, Chart Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KMT or GTLS?
Over the past 5 years, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) delivered a total return of +33. 2%, compared to +12. 9% for Kennametal Inc. (KMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +740. 5% versus KMT's +115. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KMT or GTLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Kennametal Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning KMT is approximately 135% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kennametal Inc. (KMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 111% for Chart Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KMT or GTLS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is pulling ahead at 2. 5% versus -3. 9% for Kennametal Inc. (KMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kennametal Inc. grew EPS -12. 4% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KMT or GTLS?
Kennametal Inc.
(KMT) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 7% net margin versus 1. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTLS leads at 15. 2% versus 7. 3% for KMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KMT leads at 30. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KMT or GTLS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 17. 7x for Kennametal Inc. — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GTLS: -6. 7% to $193. 81.
08Which pays a better dividend — KMT or GTLS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kennametal Inc. (KMT) offers the highest yield at 1. 8%, versus 0. 3% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS).
09Is KMT or GTLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +740. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +740. 5%, KMT: +115. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KMT and GTLS?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
KMT pays a dividend while GTLS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(KMT: 21.8% · GTLS: -2.5%)P/E Ratio<
x
(KMT: 36.1x · GTLS: 629.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.