KRT
Karat Packaging Inc.
Packaging & Containers
Market Cap$607M
5Y Perf.+64.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
KRT vs SLGN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
Packaging & Containers
Market Cap$4.25B
5Y Perf.-4.5%
KRT vs SLGN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | KRT | SLGN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $607M | $4.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $481M | $6.58B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $32M | $283M |
| Gross Margin | 35.9% | 17.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 9.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.0x | 10.6x |
| Total Debt | $57M | $4.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $38M | $1.08B |
KRT vs SLGN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
KRT
SLGN
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) | 100 | 164.8 | +64.8% |
| Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) | 100 | 95.5 | -4.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KRT vs SLGN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: KRT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Silgan Holdings Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
KRT
Karat Packaging Inc.
The Growth Play
KRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 10.7%, EPS growth 4.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
- 91.9% 10Y total return vs SLGN's 80.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 36.3%, current ratio 2.22x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick
SLGN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.0%
- 10.7% revenue growth vs KRT's 10.7%
- Lower P/E (10.6x vs 16.0x)
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SLGN | 10.7% revenue growth vs KRT's 10.7% |
| Value | SLGN | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 16.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | KRT | 6.6% margin vs SLGN's 4.3% |
| Stability / Safety | SLGN | Beta 0.66 vs KRT's 0.87 |
| Dividends | KRT | 5.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SLGN's 2.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | KRT | +19.9% vs SLGN's -23.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | KRT | 10.7% ROA vs SLGN's 3.0%, ROIC 15.4% vs 8.7% |
KRT vs SLGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
KRT vs SLGN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLKRTLAGGINGSLGN
SLGNSilgan Holdings Inc.
1leads
KRTKarat Packaging Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SLGNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
KRT5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SLGN6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
KRT8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
KRT6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLGN is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.6B annually — 13.7x KRT's $481M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.6% (KRT) to 4.3% (SLGN). On growth, KRT holds the edge at +12.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | KRTKarat Packaging I… | SLGNSilgan Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $481M | $6.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $58M | $966M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $32M | $283M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $307M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.9% | +17.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +9.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.9% | +6.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.3% | -6.3% |
KRT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SLGN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.9x trailing earnings, SLGN trades at a 24% valuation discount to KRT's 19.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SLGN's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KRT's 10.1x.
| Metric | KRTKarat Packaging I… | SLGNSilgan Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $607M | $4.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $626M | $7.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.49x | 14.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.02x | 10.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.93x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.06x | 7.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.30x | 0.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.91x | 1.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.71x | 10.07x |
SLGN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KRT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KRT delivers a 20.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $12 for SLGN. KRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLGN's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLGN scores 8/9 vs KRT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | KRTKarat Packaging I… | SLGNSilgan Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.0% | +12.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.7% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.4% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.7% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 2.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $19M | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $38M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $57M | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 27.87x | 3.36x |
KRT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KRT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KRT five years ago would be worth $19,438 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,137 for SLGN. Over the past 12 months, KRT leads with a +19.9% total return vs SLGN's -23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRT at 34.7% vs SLGN's -3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | KRTKarat Packaging I… | SLGNSilgan Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.0% | -1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.9% | -23.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.5% | -11.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.4% | +1.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +91.9% | +80.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.7% | -3.8% |
KRT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KRT and SLGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLGN is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KRT's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRT currently trades 93.1% from its 52-week high vs SLGN's 70.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | KRTKarat Packaging I… | SLGNSilgan Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.68 | $57.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.61 | $36.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.1% | +70.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.3 | 51.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 81K | 769K |
Evenly matched — KRT and SLGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KRT and SLGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KRT as "Buy" and SLGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for SLGN (target: $51) vs -21.1% for KRT (target: $24). For income investors, KRT offers the higher dividend yield at 5.88% vs SLGN's 2.00%.
| Metric | KRTKarat Packaging I… | SLGNSilgan Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $50.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.9% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.79 | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +1.6% |
Evenly matched — KRT and SLGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
KRT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SLGN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallKarat Packaging Inc. (KRT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
KRT vs SLGN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KRT or SLGN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) is the stronger pick with 10. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 7% for Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT). Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) offers the better valuation at 14. 9x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KRT or SLGN?
On trailing P/E, Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) is the cheapest at 14. 9x versus Karat Packaging Inc. at 19. 5x. On forward P/E, Silgan Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KRT or SLGN?
Over the past 5 years, Karat Packaging Inc.
(KRT) delivered a total return of +94. 4%, compared to +1. 4% for Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRT returned +91. 9% versus SLGN's +80. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KRT or SLGN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Karat Packaging Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning KRT is approximately 31% more volatile than SLGN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 2% for Silgan Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KRT or SLGN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) is pulling ahead at 10. 7% versus 10. 7% for Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Karat Packaging Inc. grew EPS 4. 7% year-over-year, compared to 4. 7% for Silgan Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KRT leads at 3. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KRT or SLGN?
Karat Packaging Inc.
(KRT) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 7% net margin versus 4. 4% for Silgan Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLGN leads at 10. 2% versus 8. 8% for KRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRT leads at 36. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KRT or SLGN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Karat Packaging Inc. — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLGN: 25. 4% to $50. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — KRT or SLGN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) offers the highest yield at 5. 9%, versus 2. 0% for Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN).
09Is KRT or SLGN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLGN: +80. 8%, KRT: +91. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KRT and SLGN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SLGN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(KRT: 12.9% · SLGN: 6.5%)Net Margin>
%
(KRT: 6.6% · SLGN: 4.3%)P/E Ratio<
x
(KRT: 19.5x · SLGN: 14.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.