Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
KYTX vs CABA vs AUTL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
KYTX vs CABA vs AUTL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $407M | $409M | $410M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $51M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-161M | $-168M | $-225M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | -309.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | -8.6% |
| Total Debt | $8M | $27M | $53M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $97M | $83M | $227M |
KYTX vs CABA vs AUTL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kyverna Therapeutic… (KYTX) | 100 | 34.2 | -65.8% |
| Cabaletta Bio, Inc. (CABA) | 100 | 17.5 | -82.5% |
| Autolus Therapeutic… (AUTL) | 100 | 26.8 | -73.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KYTX vs CABA vs AUTL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KYTX is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and momentum.
- 5.0% margin vs AUTL's -439.7%
- +360.4% vs AUTL's +30.5%
CABA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- EPS growth 29.9%
- -60.0% 10Y total return vs KYTX's -69.0%
AUTL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.95
- Lower volatility, beta 1.95, Low D/E 12.3%, current ratio 10.88x
- Beta 1.95, current ratio 10.88x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 496.0% revenue growth vs KYTX's -91.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.0% margin vs AUTL's -439.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.95 vs KYTX's 3.05 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +360.4% vs AUTL's +30.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -34.0% ROA vs CABA's -90.2%, ROIC -204.1% vs -429.6% |
KYTX vs CABA vs AUTL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
KYTX vs CABA vs AUTL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CABA leads in 2 of 6 categories
AUTL leads 1 • KYTX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CABA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AUTL and CABA operate at a comparable scale, with $51M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $51M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$170M | -$172M | -$427M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$161M | -$168M | -$225M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$158M | -$132M | -$278M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | -3.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | -8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | -4.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | -5.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | +36.9% | +3.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — KYTX and AUTL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $407M | $409M | $410M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $319M | $353M | $235M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.79x | -2.44x | -1.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 40.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.34x | 3.65x | 0.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AUTL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AUTL delivers a -84.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-85 in annual profit, vs $-122 for CABA. KYTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CABA's 0.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KYTX scores 5/9 vs CABA's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -106.0% | -121.7% | -84.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -86.0% | -90.2% | -34.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -106.0% | -4.3% | -2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -87.4% | -126.2% | -45.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.24x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$88M | -$56M | -$175M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $97M | $83M | $227M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $27M | $53M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2204.37x | — | -25.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CABA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CABA five years ago would be worth $4,180 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,989 for AUTL. Over the past 12 months, KYTX leads with a +360.4% total return vs AUTL's +30.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AUTL at -5.1% vs KYTX's -32.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.0% | +81.0% | -14.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +360.4% | +244.8% | +30.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.0% | -65.8% | -14.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.0% | -58.2% | -70.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.0% | -60.0% | -93.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.3% | -30.1% | -5.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CABA and AUTL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AUTL is the less volatile stock with a 1.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KYTX's 3.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CABA currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs AUTL's 59.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.05x | 2.54x | 1.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.67 | $4.23 | $2.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.95 | $1.11 | $1.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.0% | +94.6% | +59.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.2 | 60.8 | 64.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 869K | 2.8M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KYTX as "Buy", CABA as "Buy", AUTL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 452.6% upside for AUTL (target: $9) vs 251.3% for KYTX (target: $33).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.67 | $16.33 | $8.87 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 12 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
CABA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). AUTL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
KYTX vs CABA vs AUTL: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KYTX or CABA or AUTL a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYTX) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KYTX or CABA or AUTL?
Over the past 5 years, Cabaletta Bio, Inc.
(CABA) delivered a total return of -58. 2%, compared to -70. 1% for Autolus Therapeutics plc (AUTL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CABA returned -60. 0% versus AUTL's -93. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KYTX or CABA or AUTL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Autolus Therapeutics plc (AUTL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
95β versus Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. 's 3. 05β — meaning KYTX is approximately 56% more volatile than AUTL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. (KYTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 24% for Cabaletta Bio, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — KYTX or CABA or AUTL?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cabaletta Bio, Inc.
grew EPS 29. 9% year-over-year, compared to 27. 5% for Autolus Therapeutics plc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KYTX or CABA or AUTL?
Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYTX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -21. 8% for Autolus Therapeutics plc — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KYTX leads at 0. 0% versus -23. 9% for AUTL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYTX leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — KYTX or CABA or AUTL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is KYTX or CABA or AUTL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Autolus Therapeutics plc (AUTL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. (KYTX) carries a higher beta of 3. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AUTL: -93. 6%, KYTX: -69. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between KYTX and CABA and AUTL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KYTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CABA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AUTL is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.