Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LENZ vs PRPH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
LENZ vs PRPH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $278M | $5M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $1M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-82M | $-42M |
| Gross Margin | 97.2% | 191.4% |
| Operating Margin | -477.5% | -25.0% |
| Total Debt | $350K | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $678K |
LENZ vs PRPH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LENZ Therapeutics, … (LENZ) | 100 | 6.7 | -93.3% |
| ProPhase Labs, Inc. (PRPH) | 100 | 3.9 | -96.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LENZ vs PRPH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LENZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.78
- EPS growth -21.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.78, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 13.80x
PRPH is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 37.5% 10Y total return vs LENZ's -72.4%
- -58.0% vs LENZ's -61.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -71.5% revenue growth vs PRPH's -84.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | -430.3% margin vs PRPH's -38.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.78 vs PRPH's 2.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -58.0% vs LENZ's -61.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -35.1% ROA vs PRPH's -63.5%, ROIC -30.7% vs -59.4% |
LENZ vs PRPH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LENZ vs PRPH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LENZ leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LENZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $19M annually — 17.7x PRPH's $1M. LENZ is the more profitable business, keeping -4.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRPH's -38.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $1M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$91M | -$22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$82M | -$42M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$70M | -$23M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +97.2% | +191.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | -25.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | -38.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | -21.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -71.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -152.2% | +54.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PRPH leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $278M | $5M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $253M | $29M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.41x | -0.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.56x | 0.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 0.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LENZ leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LENZ delivers a -37.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-37 in annual profit, vs $-6 for PRPH. LENZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRPH's 3.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LENZ scores 5/9 vs PRPH's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -37.5% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -35.1% | -63.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -30.7% | -59.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -37.2% | -75.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 3.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$25M | $24M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $678,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $350,000 | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -7.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LENZ and PRPH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRPH five years ago would be worth $3,682 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,757 for LENZ. Over the past 12 months, PRPH leads with a -58.0% total return vs LENZ's -61.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LENZ at 16.6% vs PRPH's -69.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.3% | -66.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -61.6% | -58.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.4% | -97.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.4% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.4% | +37.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.6% | -69.4% |
Risk & Volatility
LENZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LENZ is the less volatile stock with a 1.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRPH's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LENZ currently trades 19.3% from its 52-week high vs PRPH's 6.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.78x | 2.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.40 | $1.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.25 | $0.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.3% | +6.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.5 | 56.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 909K | 105K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $51.67 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% |
LENZ leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRPH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LENZ vs PRPH: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LENZ or PRPH a better buy right now?
Analysts rate LENZ Therapeutics, Inc.
(LENZ) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LENZ or PRPH?
Over the past 5 years, ProPhase Labs, Inc.
(PRPH) delivered a total return of -63. 2%, compared to -72. 4% for LENZ Therapeutics, Inc. (LENZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRPH returned +37. 5% versus LENZ's -72. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LENZ or PRPH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LENZ Therapeutics, Inc.
(LENZ) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 78β versus ProPhase Labs, Inc. 's 2. 28β — meaning PRPH is approximately 28% more volatile than LENZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LENZ Therapeutics, Inc. (LENZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for ProPhase Labs, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LENZ or PRPH?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LENZ Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS -21. 8% year-over-year, compared to -166. 3% for ProPhase Labs, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LENZ leads at 8. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LENZ or PRPH?
LENZ Therapeutics, Inc.
(LENZ) is the more profitable company, earning -430. 3% net margin versus -788. 2% for ProPhase Labs, Inc. — meaning it keeps -430. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LENZ leads at -477. 5% versus -570. 6% for PRPH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LENZ leads at 97. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LENZ or PRPH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LENZ or PRPH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LENZ Therapeutics, Inc.
(LENZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. ProPhase Labs, Inc. (PRPH) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LENZ: -72. 4%, PRPH: +37. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LENZ and PRPH?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.