Medical - Pharmaceuticals
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
LFMD vs HIMS vs NUVB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Equipment & Services
Biotechnology
LFMD vs HIMS vs NUVB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Pharmaceuticals | Medical - Equipment & Services | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $215M | $6.63B | $1.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $219M | $2.35B | $143M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $128M | $-146M |
| Gross Margin | 86.7% | 69.7% | 91.6% |
| Operating Margin | -5.9% | 4.6% | -105.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 51.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $6M | $1.12B | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $229M | $164M |
LFMD vs HIMS vs NUVB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LifeMD, Inc. (LFMD) | 100 | 66.5 | -33.5% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 244.9 | +144.9% |
| Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) | 100 | 48.2 | -51.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LFMD vs HIMS vs NUVB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LFMD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 220.7% 10Y total return vs HIMS's 161.9%
- Better valuation composite
- 1.5% yield; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 5.5% margin vs NUVB's -102.1%
- 6.0% ROA vs LFMD's -24.3%
NUVB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 2.04
- Rev growth 7.0%, EPS growth 71.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.04, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 6.95x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.0% revenue growth vs LFMD's -8.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs NUVB's -102.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.04 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +136.3% vs HIMS's -51.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs LFMD's -24.3% |
LFMD vs HIMS vs NUVB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LFMD vs HIMS vs NUVB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NUVB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 16.4x NUVB's $143M. HIMS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NUVB's -102.1%. On growth, NUVB holds the edge at +26.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $219M | $2.3B | $143M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $164M | -$145M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | $128M | -$146M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $15M | $73M | -$126M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +86.7% | +69.7% | +91.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.9% | +4.6% | -105.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.8% | +5.5% | -102.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +3.1% | -88.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.6% | +28.4% | +26.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.0% | -27.3% | +106.3% |
Valuation Metrics
LFMD leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $215M | $6.6B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $185M | $7.5B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.52x | 50.32x | -8.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 51.51x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 42.68x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.11x | 2.82x | 26.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.75x | 12.25x | 5.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.61x | 89.61x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-162 for LFMD. NUVB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LFMD scores 5/9 vs NUVB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -162.4% | +23.7% | -44.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -24.3% | +6.0% | -23.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +10.7% | -54.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -37.4% | +10.9% | -42.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.27x | 2.07x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30M | $892M | -$154M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $229M | $164M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $1.1B | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.48x | — | -162.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NUVB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,173 for NUVB. Over the past 12 months, NUVB leads with a +136.3% total return vs HIMS's -51.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NUVB at 43.8% vs HIMS's 29.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.7% | -23.2% | -43.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -43.9% | -51.0% | +136.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +178.9% | +116.6% | +197.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.8% | +137.6% | -58.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +220.7% | +161.9% | -51.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.8% | +29.4% | +43.8% |
Risk & Volatility
NUVB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NUVB is the less volatile stock with a 2.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUVB currently trades 49.4% from its 52-week high vs LFMD's 28.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.12x | 2.40x | 2.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.84 | $70.43 | $9.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.56 | $13.74 | $1.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.3% | +36.4% | +49.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.8 | 54.5 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 34.9M | 4.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LFMD as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold", NUVB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 157.3% upside for NUVB (target: $12) vs 15.6% for HIMS (target: $30). LFMD is the only dividend payer here at 1.53% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.50 | $29.67 | $12.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 19 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.07 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% |
NUVB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). LFMD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
LFMD vs HIMS vs NUVB: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LFMD or HIMS or NUVB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is the stronger pick with 699. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 7% for LifeMD, Inc. (LFMD). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) offers the better valuation at 50. 3x trailing P/E (51. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LifeMD, Inc. (LFMD) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LFMD or HIMS or NUVB?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -58. 3% for Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LFMD returned +220. 7% versus NUVB's -51. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LFMD or HIMS or NUVB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 04β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 18% more volatile than NUVB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LFMD or HIMS or NUVB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is pulling ahead at 699. 0% versus -8. 7% for LifeMD, Inc. (LFMD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nuvation Bio Inc. grew EPS 71. 6% year-over-year, compared to -3. 8% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LFMD or HIMS or NUVB?
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 5% net margin versus -325. 3% for Nuvation Bio Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HIMS leads at 5. 2% versus -338. 7% for NUVB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NUVB leads at 86. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is LFMD or HIMS or NUVB more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NUVB: 157.
3% to $12. 40.
07Which pays a better dividend — LFMD or HIMS or NUVB?
In this comparison, LFMD (1.
5% yield) pays a dividend. HIMS, NUVB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is LFMD or HIMS or NUVB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LifeMD, Inc.
(LFMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 5% yield, +220. 7% 10Y return). Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LFMD: +220. 7%, NUVB: -51. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LFMD and HIMS and NUVB?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LFMD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NUVB is a small-cap high-growth stock. LFMD pays a dividend while HIMS, NUVB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.