REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LFT vs RC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
LFT vs RC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $61M | $357M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $61M | $499M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-229M |
| Gross Margin | 69.4% | -0.0% |
| Operating Margin | 76.1% | -50.5% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $5.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $248M |
LFT vs RC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lument Finance Trus… (LFT) | 100 | 50.4 | -49.6% |
| Ready Capital Corpo… (RC) | 100 | 36.8 | -63.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LFT vs RC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 30.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87
- Beta 0.87, yield 30.2%
RC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 45.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs LFT's -1.2%
- 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs LFT's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs LFT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -12.2% margin vs RC's -45.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs RC's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 30.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs RC's 31.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -44.9% vs LFT's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.7% ROA vs RC's -2.6% |
LFT vs RC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LFT and RC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RC is the larger business by revenue, generating $499M annually — 8.1x LFT's $61M. LFT is the more profitable business, keeping -12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RC's -45.8%. On growth, RC holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $61M | $499M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $47M | -$249M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$229M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $303M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.4% | -0.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +76.1% | -50.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -12.2% | -45.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +60.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.5% | +24.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LFT and RC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $61M | $357M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $38M | $6.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.29x | -1.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 48.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.28x | 0.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.02x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LFT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LFT delivers a -3.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-12 for RC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RC scores 5/9 vs LFT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.3% | -12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.7% | -2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +1.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 3.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$23M | $5.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $248M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $5.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LFT and RC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LFT five years ago would be worth $6,981 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,564 for RC. Over the past 12 months, RC leads with a -44.9% total return vs LFT's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LFT at 5.9% vs RC's -23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.4% | +1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -49.4% | -44.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.8% | -54.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.2% | -44.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.2% | +6.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.9% | -23.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LFT and RC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RC's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.68 | $4.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.15 | $1.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.3% | +45.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.9 | 64.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 128K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LFT and RC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, RC offers the higher dividend yield at 31.37% vs LFT's 30.16%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +30.2% | +31.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.35 | $0.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +18.9% |
LFT leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency. 5 categories are tied.
LFT vs RC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LFT or RC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is the stronger pick with 1726% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100.
0% for Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT). Analysts rate Ready Capital Corporation (RC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LFT or RC?
Over the past 5 years, Lument Finance Trust, Inc.
(LFT) delivered a total return of -30. 2%, compared to -44. 4% for Ready Capital Corporation (RC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RC returned +6. 1% versus LFT's -1. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LFT or RC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lument Finance Trust, Inc.
(LFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Ready Capital Corporation's 1. 17β — meaning RC is approximately 35% more volatile than LFT relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — LFT or RC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is pulling ahead at 1726% versus -100.
0% for Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ready Capital Corporation grew EPS 45. 2% year-over-year, compared to -141. 2% for Lument Finance Trust, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LFT or RC?
Lument Finance Trust, Inc.
(LFT) is the more profitable company, earning -12. 2% net margin versus -45. 8% for Ready Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps -12. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LFT leads at 76. 1% versus 24. 2% for RC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RC leads at 87. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LFT or RC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ready Capital Corporation (RC) offers the highest yield at 31. 4%, versus 30. 2% for Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT).
07Is LFT or RC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lument Finance Trust, Inc.
(LFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 30. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LFT: -1. 2%, RC: +6. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LFT and RC?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LFT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.