Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
LGHL vs FUTU vs UP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
LGHL vs FUTU vs UP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $168K | $51.52B | $242M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $-31M | $13.59B | $736M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-41M | $7.91B | $-294M |
| Gross Margin | 119.5% | 82.0% | 2.2% |
| Operating Margin | 169.8% | 48.7% | -34.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 1.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $5M | $8.55B | $157M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $11.69B | $134M |
LGHL vs FUTU vs UP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lion Group Holding … (LGHL) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Futu Holdings Limit… (FUTU) | 100 | 328.5 | +228.5% |
| Wheels Up Experienc… (UP) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LGHL vs FUTU vs UP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LGHL is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 87.7% margin vs UP's -39.9%
FUTU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 2.04
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth 27.2%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs UP's -99.7%
UP plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% NII/revenue growth vs LGHL's -278.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 87.7% margin vs UP's -39.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.04 vs UP's 2.50 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.1% vs LGHL's -99.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs LGHL's -79.2%, ROIC 14.8% vs -187.3% |
LGHL vs FUTU vs UP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LGHL vs FUTU vs UP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LGHL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUTU and LGHL operate at a comparable scale, with $13.6B and -$31M in trailing revenue. LGHL is the more profitable business, keeping 87.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UP's -39.9%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$31M | $13.6B | $736M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$56M | $10.0B | -$191M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$41M | $7.9B | -$294M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | $0 | -$270M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +119.5% | +82.0% | +2.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +169.8% | +48.7% | -34.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +87.7% | +40.1% | -39.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +61.1% | +2.3% | -36.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | -10.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -74.4% | +112.0% | +69.2% |
Valuation Metrics
UP leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $168,280 | $51.5B | $242M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$12M | $51.1B | $265M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | 29.18x | -0.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 1.53x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.30x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 58.89x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 29.69x | 0.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.02x | 5.67x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.09x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FUTU leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUTU delivers a 26.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $-3 for LGHL. FUTU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LGHL's 0.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FUTU scores 4/9 vs LGHL's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | +26.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -79.2% | +4.6% | -29.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -187.3% | +14.8% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.7% | +25.1% | -167.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.64x | 0.31x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | -$3.1B | $23M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $11.7B | $134M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $8.6B | $157M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -55.08x | — | -2.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUTU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUTU five years ago would be worth $11,495 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for LGHL. Over the past 12 months, FUTU leads with a +45.1% total return vs LGHL's -99.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUTU at 53.6% vs LGHL's -96.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -94.6% | -17.4% | -49.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.6% | +45.1% | -71.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +262.2% | -93.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +15.0% | -99.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +875.5% | -99.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -96.9% | +53.6% | -59.3% |
Risk & Volatility
FUTU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FUTU is the less volatile stock with a 2.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UP's 2.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FUTU currently trades 71.5% from its 52-week high vs LGHL's 0.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.04x | 2.04x | 2.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $377.52 | $202.53 | $70.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.75 | $99.20 | $0.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.2% | +71.5% | +9.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 21.1 | 65.0 | 38.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 1.4M | 131K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FUTU as "Buy", UP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 7373.8% upside for UP (target: $500) vs 55.2% for FUTU (target: $225).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $224.80 | $500.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.7% |
FUTU leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). LGHL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
LGHL vs FUTU vs UP: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGHL or FUTU or UP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is the stronger pick with 35.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -278. 8% for Lion Group Holding Ltd. (LGHL). Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) offers the better valuation at 29. 2x trailing P/E (1. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LGHL or FUTU or UP?
Over the past 5 years, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) delivered a total return of +15.
0%, compared to -100. 0% for Lion Group Holding Ltd. (LGHL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUTU returned +875. 5% versus LGHL's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LGHL or FUTU or UP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is the lower-risk stock at 2.
04β versus Wheels Up Experience Inc. 's 2. 50β — meaning UP is approximately 22% more volatile than FUTU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 64% for Lion Group Holding Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LGHL or FUTU or UP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is pulling ahead at 35.
8% versus -278. 8% for Lion Group Holding Ltd. (LGHL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Futu Holdings Limited grew EPS 27. 2% year-over-year, compared to -21. 2% for Lion Group Holding Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LGHL or FUTU or UP?
Lion Group Holding Ltd.
(LGHL) is the more profitable company, earning 87. 7% net margin versus -39. 9% for Wheels Up Experience Inc. — meaning it keeps 87. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LGHL leads at 169. 8% versus -34. 3% for UP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LGHL leads at 119. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is LGHL or FUTU or UP more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UP: 7373.
8% to $500. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — LGHL or FUTU or UP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is LGHL or FUTU or UP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+875.
5% 10Y return). Lion Group Holding Ltd. (LGHL) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUTU: +875. 5%, LGHL: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LGHL and FUTU and UP?
These companies operate in different sectors (LGHL (Financial Services) and FUTU (Financial Services) and UP (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LGHL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FUTU is a mid-cap high-growth stock; UP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.