LGHL
Lion Group Holding Ltd.
Financial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$168K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
LGHL vs TIGR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A
Financial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$628M
5Y Perf.+93.1%
LGHL vs TIGR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | LGHL | TIGR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $168K | $628M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $-31M | $392M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-41M | $118M |
| Gross Margin | 119.5% | 65.0% |
| Operating Margin | 169.8% | 35.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.8x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $180M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $394M |
LGHL vs TIGR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
LGHL
TIGR
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lion Group Holding … (LGHL) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR) | 100 | 193.1 | +93.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LGHL vs TIGR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TIGR leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Lion Group Holding Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LGHL
Lion Group Holding Ltd.
The Banking Pick
LGHL is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 87.7% margin vs TIGR's 15.5%
Best for: value and quality
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A
The Banking Pick
TIGR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 2.02
- Rev growth 43.7%, EPS growth 71.4%
- -39.9% 10Y total return vs LGHL's -100.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TIGR | 43.7% NII/revenue growth vs LGHL's -278.8% |
| Value | LGHL | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | LGHL | 87.7% margin vs TIGR's 15.5% |
| Stability / Safety | TIGR | Beta 2.02 vs LGHL's 2.04, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TIGR | -29.9% vs LGHL's -99.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TIGR | 1.6% ROA vs LGHL's -79.2%, ROIC 13.8% vs -187.3% |
LGHL vs TIGR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2024
LGHL vs TIGR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTIGRLAGGINGLGHL
LGHLLion Group Holding Lt…
2leads
TIGRUP Fintech Holding Lt…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs LGHLMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
LGHL3/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
LGHL2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TIGR8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TIGR6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
TIGR2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LGHL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TIGR and LGHL operate at a comparable scale, with $392M and -$31M in trailing revenue. LGHL is the more profitable business, keeping 87.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TIGR's 15.5%.
| Metric | LGHLLion Group Holdin… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$31M | $392M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$56M | $225M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$41M | $118M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | $673M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +119.5% | +65.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +169.8% | +35.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +87.7% | +15.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +61.1% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -74.4% | +12.4% |
LGHL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
LGHL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LGHLLion Group Holdin… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $168,280 | $628M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$12M | $414M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | 17.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 2.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.02x | 1.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 0.76x |
LGHL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TIGR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TIGR delivers a 17.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-3 for LGHL. TIGR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LGHL's 0.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TIGR scores 6/9 vs LGHL's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | LGHLLion Group Holdin… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | +17.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -79.2% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -187.3% | +13.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.7% | +18.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.64x | 0.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | -$214M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $394M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $180M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -55.08x | 3.26x |
TIGR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TIGR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TIGR five years ago would be worth $3,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for LGHL. Over the past 12 months, TIGR leads with a -29.9% total return vs LGHL's -99.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TIGR at 30.4% vs LGHL's -96.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LGHLLion Group Holdin… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -94.6% | -38.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.6% | -29.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +121.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -62.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -39.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -96.9% | +30.4% |
TIGR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TIGR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TIGR is the less volatile stock with a 2.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LGHL's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TIGR currently trades 47.5% from its 52-week high vs LGHL's 0.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LGHLLion Group Holdin… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.04x | 2.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $377.52 | $13.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.75 | $5.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.2% | +47.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 21.1 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 2.3M |
TIGR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | LGHLLion Group Holdin… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $4.73 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
TIGR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). LGHL leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallUP Fintech Holding Ltd. Spo… (TIGR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
LGHL vs TIGR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGHL or TIGR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the stronger pick with 43. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -278. 8% for Lion Group Holding Ltd. (LGHL). UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) offers the better valuation at 17. 9x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) a "Sell" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LGHL or TIGR?
Over the past 5 years, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) delivered a total return of -62. 3%, compared to -100. 0% for Lion Group Holding Ltd. (LGHL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TIGR returned -39. 9% versus LGHL's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LGHL or TIGR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 02β versus Lion Group Holding Ltd. 's 2. 04β — meaning LGHL is approximately 1% more volatile than TIGR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 64% for Lion Group Holding Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LGHL or TIGR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is pulling ahead at 43. 7% versus -278. 8% for Lion Group Holding Ltd. (LGHL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A grew EPS 71. 4% year-over-year, compared to -21. 2% for Lion Group Holding Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LGHL or TIGR?
Lion Group Holding Ltd.
(LGHL) is the more profitable company, earning 87. 7% net margin versus 15. 5% for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A — meaning it keeps 87. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LGHL leads at 169. 8% versus 35. 6% for TIGR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LGHL leads at 119. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LGHL or TIGR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LGHL or TIGR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Lion Group Holding Ltd. (LGHL) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TIGR: -39. 9%, LGHL: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LGHL and TIGR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LGHL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TIGR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(LGHL: -278.8% · TIGR: 43.7%)Net Margin>
%
(LGHL: 87.7% · TIGR: 15.5%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.