Auto - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LI vs ZK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Manufacturers
LI vs ZK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $35.58B | $6.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $125.72B | $90.59B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4.51B | $-3.33B |
| Gross Margin | 19.4% | 18.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.3% | -4.0% |
| Forward P/E | 11.4x | 2.3x |
| Total Debt | $16.34B | $15.60B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $65.90B | $7.78B |
LI vs ZK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Li Auto Inc. (LI) | 100 | 87.5 | -12.5% |
| ZEEKR Intelligent T… (ZK) | 100 | 106.0 | +6.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LI vs ZK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs ZK's -5.4%
- 3.6% margin vs ZK's -3.7%
- 2.8% ROA vs ZK's -5.4%
ZK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.47
- Rev growth 46.9%, EPS growth 34.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 126.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, current ratio 0.63x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 46.9% revenue growth vs LI's 16.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.3x vs 11.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.6% margin vs ZK's -3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs LI's 0.94 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.3% vs LI's -31.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.8% ROA vs ZK's -5.4% |
LI vs ZK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LI vs ZK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LI and ZK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LI and ZK operate at a comparable scale, with $125.7B and $90.6B in trailing revenue. LI is the more profitable business, keeping 3.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ZK's -3.7%. On growth, ZK holds the edge at +36.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $125.7B | $90.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.4B | -$2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4.5B | -$3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7.7B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +18.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | -4.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | -3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +2.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.5% | +36.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -123.3% | +83.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ZK leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35.6B | $6.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28.3B | $14.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.02x | -0.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.36x | 2.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.49x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.68x | 0.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.80x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 29.57x | 4.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LI leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.8% | -5.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$49.6B | $7.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $65.9B | $7.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16.3B | $15.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 28.54x | -14.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ZK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LI five years ago would be worth $9,850 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,459 for ZK. Over the past 12 months, ZK leads with a +18.3% total return vs LI's -31.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ZK at -1.8% vs LI's -10.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.7% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.0% | +18.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.4% | -5.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.5% | -5.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.7% | -5.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.5% | -1.8% |
Risk & Volatility
ZK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZK is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LI's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ZK currently trades 84.3% from its 52-week high vs LI's 55.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.03 | $31.71 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.71 | $22.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.3% | +84.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.5 | 40.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LI as "Buy" and ZK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.4% upside for ZK (target: $33) vs 12.9% for LI (target: $20).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.01 | $33.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.7% |
ZK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). LI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
LI vs ZK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LI or ZK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) is the stronger pick with 46.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 7% for Li Auto Inc. (LI). Li Auto Inc. (LI) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Li Auto Inc. (LI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LI or ZK?
On forward P/E, ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited is actually cheaper at 2.
3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LI or ZK?
Over the past 5 years, Li Auto Inc.
(LI) delivered a total return of -1. 5%, compared to -5. 4% for ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LI returned +7. 7% versus ZK's -5. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LI or ZK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
47β versus Li Auto Inc. 's 0. 94β — meaning LI is approximately 102% more volatile than ZK relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — LI or ZK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) is pulling ahead at 46.
9% versus 16. 7% for Li Auto Inc. (LI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited grew EPS 34. 6% year-over-year, compared to -31. 8% for Li Auto Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZK leads at 126. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LI or ZK?
Li Auto Inc.
(LI) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 6% net margin versus -8. 5% for ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited — meaning it keeps 5. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LI leads at 4. 4% versus -8. 5% for ZK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LI leads at 20. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LI or ZK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) trades at 2.
3x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for Li Auto Inc. — 9. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZK: 24. 4% to $33. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — LI or ZK?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LI or ZK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
47)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZK: -5. 4%, LI: +7. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LI and ZK?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.