Home Improvement
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LIVE vs FND
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Home Improvement
LIVE vs FND — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Home Improvement | Home Improvement |
| Market Cap | $39M | $5.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $442M | $4.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $199M |
| Gross Margin | 33.0% | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | 3.9% | 5.7% |
| Forward P/E | 2.6x | 25.8x |
| Total Debt | $216M | $3.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $249M |
LIVE vs FND — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE) | 100 | 119.4 | +19.4% |
| Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) | 100 | 98.1 | -1.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LIVE vs FND
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LIVE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.23
- Rev growth -5.9%, EPS growth 158.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.23, current ratio 1.56x
FND is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 59.2% 10Y total return vs LIVE's 28.8%
- 5.1% revenue growth vs LIVE's -5.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% revenue growth vs LIVE's -5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.6x vs 25.8x), PEG 0.26 vs 30.21 | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.0% margin vs FND's 4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.23 vs FND's 1.80 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -6.3% vs FND's -30.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.7% ROA vs FND's 3.9%, ROIC 3.5% vs 4.4% |
LIVE vs FND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LIVE vs FND — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FND is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 10.6x LIVE's $442M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.0% (LIVE) to 4.3% (FND).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $442M | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $29M | $443M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | $199M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | $105M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +41.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +5.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.7% | -0.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -112.5% | -17.8% |
Valuation Metrics
LIVE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.6x trailing earnings, LIVE trades at a 90% valuation discount to FND's 26.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LIVE offers better value at 0.26x vs FND's 30.21x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $39M | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $246M | $8.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.56x | 26.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.26x | 30.21x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.72x | 17.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.09x | 1.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.58x | 2.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.84x | 86.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LIVE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIVE delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $8 for FND. FND carries lower financial leverage with a 1.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIVE's 2.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIVE scores 7/9 vs FND's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.3% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.5% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.27x | 1.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $208M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $249M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $216M | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.01x | 22.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FND leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FND five years ago would be worth $4,507 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,424 for LIVE. Over the past 12 months, LIVE leads with a -6.3% total return vs FND's -30.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FND at -17.9% vs LIVE's -25.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.8% | -19.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.3% | -30.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.0% | -44.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.8% | -54.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.8% | +59.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.1% | -17.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LIVE and FND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIVE is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FND's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FND currently trades 55.2% from its 52-week high vs LIVE's 48.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 1.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.88 | $92.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.01 | $46.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.7% | +55.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.5 | 40.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
FND leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $63.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | 0.0% |
FND leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). LIVE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
LIVE vs FND: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LIVE or FND a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.
(FND) is the stronger pick with 5. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 9% for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE). Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) offers the better valuation at 2. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) a "Hold" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LIVE or FND?
On trailing P/E, Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the cheapest at 2.
6x versus Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. at 26. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LIVE or FND?
Over the past 5 years, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.
(FND) delivered a total return of -54. 9%, compared to -65. 8% for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FND returned +59. 2% versus LIVE's +28. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LIVE or FND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
23β versus Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning FND is approximately 46% more volatile than LIVE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 151% versus 2% for Live Ventures Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LIVE or FND?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.
(FND) is pulling ahead at 5. 1% versus -5. 9% for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Live Ventures Incorporated grew EPS 158. 1% year-over-year, compared to 1. 1% for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIVE leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LIVE or FND?
Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
1% net margin versus 4. 5% for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FND leads at 5. 9% versus 3. 3% for LIVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FND leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — LIVE or FND?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is LIVE or FND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
23)). Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIVE: +28. 8%, FND: +59. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LIVE and FND?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LIVE is a small-cap deep-value stock; FND is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.