Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LIVE vs FND

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LIVE
Live Ventures Incorporated

Home Improvement

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$39M
5Y Perf.+19.4%
FND
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.

Home Improvement

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.51B
5Y Perf.-1.9%

LIVE vs FND — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LIVE logoLIVE
FND logoFND
IndustryHome ImprovementHome Improvement
Market Cap$39M$5.51B
Revenue (TTM)$442M$4.68B
Net Income (TTM)$22M$199M
Gross Margin33.0%41.2%
Operating Margin3.9%5.7%
Forward P/E2.6x25.8x
Total Debt$216M$3.63B
Cash & Equiv.$9M$249M

LIVE vs FNDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LIVE
FND
StockMay 20May 26Return
Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE)100119.4+19.4%
Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND)10098.1-1.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LIVE vs FND

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LIVE leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LIVE
Live Ventures Incorporated
The Income Pick

LIVE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.23
  • Rev growth -5.9%, EPS growth 158.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.23, current ratio 1.56x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
FND
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

FND is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 59.2% 10Y total return vs LIVE's 28.8%
  • 5.1% revenue growth vs LIVE's -5.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFND logoFND5.1% revenue growth vs LIVE's -5.9%
ValueLIVE logoLIVELower P/E (2.6x vs 25.8x), PEG 0.26 vs 30.21
Quality / MarginsLIVE logoLIVE5.0% margin vs FND's 4.3%
Stability / SafetyLIVE logoLIVEBeta 1.23 vs FND's 1.80
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LIVE logoLIVE-6.3% vs FND's -30.2%
Efficiency (ROA)LIVE logoLIVE5.7% ROA vs FND's 3.9%, ROIC 3.5% vs 4.4%

LIVE vs FND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LIVELive Ventures Incorporated
FY 2023
Flooring Manufacturing
54.6%$110M
Steel Manufacturing
44.2%$89M
Corporate and Other
1.2%$2M
FNDFloor & Decor Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Tile
38.6%$1.1B
Installation Materials And Tools
34.7%$957M
Wood
12.1%$333M
Natural Stone
7.3%$202M
Adjacent Categories
4.2%$116M
Product and Service, Other
3.2%$87M

LIVE vs FND — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFNDLAGGINGLIVE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FND is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 10.6x LIVE's $442M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.0% (LIVE) to 4.3% (FND).

MetricLIVE logoLIVELive Ventures Inc…FND logoFNDFloor & Decor Hol…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$442M$4.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$29M$443M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$22M$199M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$22M$105M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+33.0%+41.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.9%+5.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.0%+4.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.0%+2.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.7%-0.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-112.5%-17.8%
FND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LIVE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 2.6x trailing earnings, LIVE trades at a 90% valuation discount to FND's 26.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LIVE offers better value at 0.26x vs FND's 30.21x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricLIVE logoLIVELive Ventures Inc…FND logoFNDFloor & Decor Hol…
Market CapShares × price$39M$5.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$246M$8.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS2.56x26.57x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.82x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.26x30.21x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.72x17.29x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.09x1.18x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.58x2.30x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF1.84x86.07x
LIVE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LIVE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

LIVE delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $8 for FND. FND carries lower financial leverage with a 1.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIVE's 2.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIVE scores 7/9 vs FND's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLIVE logoLIVELive Ventures Inc…FND logoFNDFloor & Decor Hol…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+23.3%+8.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.7%+3.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.5%+4.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.3%+6.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–974
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.27x1.51x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$208M$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$9M$249M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$216M$3.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense5.01x22.72x
LIVE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FND leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FND five years ago would be worth $4,507 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,424 for LIVE. Over the past 12 months, LIVE leads with a -6.3% total return vs FND's -30.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FND at -17.9% vs LIVE's -25.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLIVE logoLIVELive Ventures Inc…FND logoFNDFloor & Decor Hol…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-19.8%-19.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-6.3%-30.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-58.0%-44.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-65.8%-54.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+28.8%+59.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-25.1%-17.9%
FND leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LIVE and FND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LIVE is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FND's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FND currently trades 55.2% from its 52-week high vs LIVE's 48.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLIVE logoLIVELive Ventures Inc…FND logoFNDFloor & Decor Hol…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.23x1.80x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$25.88$92.41
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.01$46.47
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+48.7%+55.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10037.540.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5K2.7M
Evenly matched — LIVE and FND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FND leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
MetricLIVE logoLIVELive Ventures Inc…FND logoFNDFloor & Decor Hol…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$63.18
# AnalystsCovering analysts37
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.4%0.0%
FND leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

FND leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). LIVE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallFloor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LIVE vs FND: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LIVE or FND a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.

(FND) is the stronger pick with 5. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 9% for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE). Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) offers the better valuation at 2. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) a "Hold" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LIVE or FND?

On trailing P/E, Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the cheapest at 2.

6x versus Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. at 26. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LIVE or FND?

Over the past 5 years, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.

(FND) delivered a total return of -54. 9%, compared to -65. 8% for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FND returned +59. 2% versus LIVE's +28. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LIVE or FND?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

23β versus Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning FND is approximately 46% more volatile than LIVE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 151% versus 2% for Live Ventures Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LIVE or FND?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.

(FND) is pulling ahead at 5. 1% versus -5. 9% for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Live Ventures Incorporated grew EPS 158. 1% year-over-year, compared to 1. 1% for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIVE leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LIVE or FND?

Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the more profitable company, earning 5.

1% net margin versus 4. 5% for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FND leads at 5. 9% versus 3. 3% for LIVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FND leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — LIVE or FND?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is LIVE or FND better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

23)). Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIVE: +28. 8%, FND: +59. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between LIVE and FND?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LIVE is a small-cap deep-value stock; FND is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

LIVE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FND

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LIVE and FND on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LIVE: -2.7% · FND: -0.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(LIVE: 5.0% · FND: 4.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(LIVE: 2.6x · FND: 26.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.