Real Estate - Development
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LRE vs NMRK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
LRE vs NMRK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Development | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $18M | $3.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36.91B | $3.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.12B | $126M |
| Gross Margin | 16.4% | 98.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.0% | 7.1% |
| Forward P/E | 4.4x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $11.60B | $2.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.30B | $349M |
LRE vs NMRK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead Real Estate Co… (LRE) | 100 | 26.7 | -73.3% |
| Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) | 100 | 254.0 | +154.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LRE vs NMRK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LRE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 0.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, current ratio 1.42x
- Beta 0.84, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.42x
NMRK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.9%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
- 26.5% 10Y total return vs LRE's -77.9%
- 21.9% FFO/revenue growth vs LRE's 8.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.9% FFO/revenue growth vs LRE's 8.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.4x vs 8.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.8% margin vs LRE's 3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs NMRK's 1.58 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NMRK's 0.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.9% vs LRE's +10.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs NMRK's 2.4%, ROIC 4.8% vs 5.2% |
LRE vs NMRK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LRE vs NMRK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NMRK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $36.9B annually — 11.2x NMRK's $3.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.8% (NMRK) to 3.0% (LRE). On growth, LRE holds the edge at +19.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36.9B | $3.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | $415M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $126M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.8B | $155M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +98.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +7.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.9% | +15.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.9% | +146.7% |
Valuation Metrics
LRE leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.4x trailing earnings, LRE trades at a 82% valuation discount to NMRK's 24.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NMRK's 11.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LRE's 13.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18M | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $83M | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.39x | 24.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.04x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.09x | 11.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.15x | 0.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.65x | 2.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NMRK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LRE delivers a 26.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $8 for NMRK. NMRK carries lower financial leverage with a 1.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LRE's 2.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NMRK scores 7/9 vs LRE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +26.5% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.1% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.74x | 1.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10.3B | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.3B | $349M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11.6B | $2.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 49.14x | 7.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NMRK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NMRK five years ago would be worth $15,587 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,211 for LRE. Over the past 12 months, NMRK leads with a +47.9% total return vs LRE's +10.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NMRK at 41.8% vs LRE's -39.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.1% | -3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.1% | +47.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.9% | +185.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.9% | +55.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.9% | +26.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.5% | +41.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LRE and NMRK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LRE is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NMRK's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NMRK currently trades 82.3% from its 52-week high vs LRE's 44.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.84x | 1.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.97 | $19.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $10.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.1% | +82.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 49.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
LRE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, LRE offers the higher dividend yield at 0.91% vs NMRK's 0.52%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $21.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.87 | $0.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.2% |
NMRK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LRE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
LRE vs NMRK: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LRE or NMRK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Newmark Group, Inc.
(NMRK) is the stronger pick with 21. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 6% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE). Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) offers the better valuation at 4. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LRE or NMRK?
On trailing P/E, Lead Real Estate Co.
, Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) is the cheapest at 4. 4x versus Newmark Group, Inc. at 24. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LRE or NMRK?
Over the past 5 years, Newmark Group, Inc.
(NMRK) delivered a total return of +55. 9%, compared to -77. 9% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NMRK returned +26. 5% versus LRE's -77. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LRE or NMRK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lead Real Estate Co.
, Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Newmark Group, Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning NMRK is approximately 89% more volatile than LRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 114% versus 3% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LRE or NMRK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Newmark Group, Inc.
(NMRK) is pulling ahead at 21. 9% versus 8. 6% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Newmark Group, Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to 4. 6% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, LRE leads at 19. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LRE or NMRK?
Newmark Group, Inc.
(NMRK) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 8% net margin versus 3. 3% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 3. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NMRK leads at 7. 0% versus 4. 7% for LRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NMRK leads at 94. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — LRE or NMRK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) offers the highest yield at 0. 9%, versus 0. 5% for Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK).
08Is LRE or NMRK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lead Real Estate Co.
, Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 0. 9% yield). Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LRE: -77. 9%, NMRK: +26. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LRE and NMRK?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LRE is a small-cap deep-value stock; NMRK is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.