Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LTBR vs SMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
LTBR vs SMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Renewable Utilities |
| Market Cap | $371M | $2.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $64M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-21M | $-380M |
| Gross Margin | — | 66.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | -9.8% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $202M | $836M |
LTBR vs SMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lightbridge Corpora… (LTBR) | 100 | 322.0 | +222.0% |
| NuScale Power Corpo… (SMR) | 100 | 124.1 | +24.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LTBR vs SMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LTBR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- EPS growth 1.2%
- 154.5% revenue growth vs SMR's -100.0%
- 1.8% margin vs SMR's -5.9%
SMR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 3.50
- 36.1% 10Y total return vs LTBR's -48.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 3.50, current ratio 4.30x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 154.5% revenue growth vs SMR's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.8% margin vs SMR's -5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 3.50 vs LTBR's 3.51 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.9% vs SMR's -23.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -12.5% ROA vs SMR's -43.0%, ROIC -21.0% vs -314.7% |
LTBR vs SMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LTBR vs SMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LTBR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMR and LTBR operate at a comparable scale, with $64M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $64M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | -$627M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$21M | -$380M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$16M | -$584M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +66.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -9.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -9.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.7% | -9.3% |
Valuation Metrics
LTBR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $371M | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $169M | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -17.91x | -6.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.73x | 1.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LTBR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LTBR delivers a -12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-13 in annual profit, vs $-87 for SMR. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LTBR scores 3/9 vs SMR's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.6% | -87.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.5% | -43.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -21.0% | -3.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.1% | -87.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 0 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$202M | -$836M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $202M | $836M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LTBR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LTBR five years ago would be worth $30,950 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,608 for SMR. Over the past 12 months, LTBR leads with a +47.9% total return vs SMR's -23.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LTBR at 60.3% vs SMR's 19.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.6% | -17.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.9% | -23.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +311.8% | +69.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +209.5% | +36.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.1% | +36.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +60.3% | +19.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LTBR and SMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMR is the less volatile stock with a 3.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LTBR's 3.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LTBR currently trades 45.7% from its 52-week high vs SMR's 23.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.51x | 3.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.34 | $57.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.85 | $8.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.7% | +23.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.2 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 839K | 25.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LTBR leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
LTBR vs SMR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LTBR or SMR a better buy right now?
Analysts rate NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LTBR or SMR?
Over the past 5 years, Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) delivered a total return of +209.
5%, compared to +36. 1% for NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMR returned +36. 1% versus LTBR's -48. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LTBR or SMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) is the lower-risk stock at 3.
50β versus Lightbridge Corporation's 3. 51β — meaning LTBR is approximately 0% more volatile than SMR relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — LTBR or SMR?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lightbridge Corporation grew EPS 1.
2% year-over-year, compared to -47. 6% for NuScale Power Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LTBR or SMR?
Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -594. 6% for NuScale Power Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LTBR leads at 0. 0% versus -984. 0% for SMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMR leads at 66. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LTBR or SMR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LTBR or SMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) carries a higher beta of 3. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMR: +36. 1%, LTBR: -48. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LTBR and SMR?
These companies operate in different sectors (LTBR (Industrials) and SMR (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.